Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
MonacoGuido
Jag vet själv domare som är inne och läser på Flashback så jag tror inte det finns någon sådan agenda.
Det tror inte jag heller, i de flesta fall.
Men åklagaren har gillrat en fälla här genom att ta med 43 inlägg, varav de allra flesta får anses vara trams i sammanhanget.
Därmed har han gett rätten en möjlighet att avvisa 40 men fälla tre, samtidigt som de kan fortsatt känna sig toleranta och oväldiga.
Till sist några ord av Baruch Spinoza, som verkar lika kontroversiella idag som när de skrevs 1669 (Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, kapitel 20)
Citat:
The harder the authorities try to take away this freedom of speech, the more stubbornly men will resist. Not everyone, of course; not the greedy or the flatterers or others whose characters are weak [244] and whose greatest joy comes from thinking about the money in their coffers and having bloated bellies. But there will be resistance from those whom a good upbringing, integrity of character, and virtue have made more free.
Citat:
From this fact about human nature, it follows that laws restricting people’s opinions don’t affect rascals but only honest men. Their target— · whether or not this was the legislators’ intention · —isn’t • to restrain scoundrels but rather • to make life difficult for honourable men.
Citat:
It’s true of course that such freedom sometimes has drawbacks. But what was ever so cleverly devised that no disadvantages could arise from it? Trying to shape laws so that they head off in advance all the disadvantages will do more harm than good; so various kinds of bad behaviour can’t be prohibited by law
