Och hela stämningsansökan är uppenbart tramsande, OpenAI är inte i närheten av att vara de enda som har ”pre-AGI” teknologi. Elon Musk sitter dessutom själv på xAI och sin egna chatbot Gork som han inte släppt en enda rad kod eller några som helst parametrar för.
Statiskt sett kommer inget hända. Sedan vet jag inte utom spekulerar men utifrån det jag vet. Du måste ha stenhård bevis om dessa typer av stämningar ska gå igenom. Sannolikt kommer fallet lösas utanför rätten eller slängas av domaren.
"Settlement dominates outcomes of civil litigation in the United States
yet surprisingly little systematic knowledge exists about settlement rates.
Casual conventional wisdom often has it that about 95 percent of cases
settle."
Som jag tror, detta kommer inte gå till rättegång sedan vi får se. Men som jag tolkar det, detta kommer inte leda någonstansv
Nej, dom har en "Open AI’s unusual structure consists of a for-profit arm that is fully owned and controlled by its parent nonprofit." men på papper är fortfarande open a.i non profit
Lär dig meningsuppbyggnad du är ju inte bättre än en galen Ai-bot.
Som jag tror detta kommer inte leda till nått .Men jag tror det inte kommer att leda till nått.
Lär dig att uttrycka dig för Jösse namn.
Elon Musk has unexpectedly asked a California court to withdraw a legal case against OpenAI and its boss Sam Altman, which accused them of abandoning the firm's founding mission of developing artificial intelligence (AI) for humanity's benefit.
...
The latest filing asked for the case's dismissal "without prejudice", meaning Mr Musk could still reactivate it at a later stage.
”Elon Musk has revived his complaint against OpenAI after dropping a previous lawsuit, again alleging that the ChatGPT maker and two of its founders — Sam Altman and Greg Brockman — breached the company’s founding mission to develop artificial intelligence technology to benefit humanity.
The new lawsuit filed in federal court in Northern California on Monday says that Altman and Brockman “assiduously manipulated Musk into co-founding their spurious non-profit venture” by promising that OpenAI would be safer and more transparent than profit-driven alternatives. The suit claims that assurances about OpenAI’s non-profit structure were “the hook for Altman’s long con.””
”Elon Musk has revived his complaint against OpenAI after dropping a previous lawsuit, again alleging that the ChatGPT maker and two of its founders — Sam Altman and Greg Brockman — breached the company’s founding mission to develop artificial intelligence technology to benefit humanity.
The new lawsuit filed in federal court in Northern California on Monday says that Altman and Brockman “assiduously manipulated Musk into co-founding their spurious non-profit venture” by promising that OpenAI would be safer and more transparent than profit-driven alternatives. The suit claims that assurances about OpenAI’s non-profit structure were “the hook for Altman’s long con.””
