Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Iradeorum
Du skämmer bara ut dig själv än mer, Pzykoplutten. Som den barnrumpa du är kan du inte ge upp ens när min fakta dragit ned brallorna till anklarna på dig. Där står du nu med rumpan bar och visar din lilla mikropenis.
”
Preußentum und Sozialismus (German: [ˈpʁɔʏsn̩tuːm ʔʊnt zotsi̯aˈlɪsmʊs]; "Prussianism and Socialism") is a book by Oswald Spengler published in 1919 that addressed the connection of the Prussian character with right-wing socialism.
”Spengler's Prussian socialism was popular amongst the German political right, especially the revolutionary right who had distanced themselves from traditional conservatism.[3] His notions of Prussian socialism influenced Nazism and the Conservative Revolutionary movement.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preussentum_und_Sozialismus
Här är förresten några insaxade texter av Rutger Essén som ytterligare understryker hur fel du har.
”
Nationalsocialisternas socialism har sålunda icke något att invända emot den enskilda äganderätten som sådan; den kräver icke nivellering varken av förmögenheterna eller av konsumtionen eller av levnadsstandarden; den intresserar sig icke heller i och för sig för kravet på socialisering av produktionsmedlen.”
”Nazisternas socialism skiljer sig alltså högst väsentligt från marxisternas socialism. Den kräver icke de viktigaste förmögenhetsobjektens överförande i samhällelig ägo. Den kräver icke ”socialisering”. Den kräver icke heller ekonomisk jämlikhet. Den förnekar marxismens kvantitativt beräknade ”mervärde” och dess utsugningsteorier. Den förnekar också marxismens psykologiska utgångspunkt, eller att all mera betydande ekonomisk makt i enskild hand ovillkorligen måste komma att utnyttjas i krasst och trångt egoistiskt och materialistiskt syfte. Den gör också en skarp skillnad mellan olika former av kapitalism. Den bekämpar till det yttersta det i högre grad rörliga internationella kreditkapitalet, vilket i den nazistiska terminologin går under många vackra namn, exempelvis ”Weltkapitalismus”, ”spekulationskapital”, ”roffarkapital” och så vidare. Men den är icke någon fiende till det direkt produktiva kapitalet, varken i fråga om jordbruk, handel eller industri, det må vara aldrig så enväldigt lett av en enskild ägare – om det endast arbetar i det allmänna folkintressets tjänst, något som ju i praktiken dess bättre nio gånger av tio är fallet. Ej heller har nazisternas socialism gemensam psykologisk bakgrund med den marxistiska. Den godkänner sålunda icke avunden som en hävstång för mänskligt framåtskridande, och den finner icke full ekonomisk jämlikhet i och för sig vara en nödvändig eller ens obetingat nyttig grundsats.”
Du blir bara mer förnedrad Iradeorumongot. Horunge. Du är så mongoloid att du inte ens kan inse fakta trots att jag konstant sparkar sönder ditt redan spräckta rövhål som din farsa innan han fortsätter med din encelliga kuk och tomma pung som du projicerar.
Vi tar upp texten igen som bevisar hur ägd du blir:
"According to some recent critics such as Ishay Landa, "Prussian socialism" has some decidedly capitalistic traits.[41] Spengler declares himself resolutely opposed to labor strikes (Spengler describes them as "the unsocialistic earmark of Marxism"), trade unions ("wage-Bolshevism" in Spengler's terms), progressive taxation or any imposition of taxes on the rich ("dry Bolshevism"), any shortening of the working day (he argues that workers should work even on Sundays), as well as any form of government insurance for sickness, old age, accidents, or unemployment.[41]"
Spengler viewed Nazi anti-Semitism as self-defeating, and personally took an ethnological view of race and culture.[42] In his private papers, he remarked upon "how much envy of the capability of other people in view of one's lack of it lies hidden in anti-Semitism!", and arguing that "when one would rather destroy business and scholarship than see Jews in them, one is an ideologue, i.e., a danger for the nation. Idiotic."[24]
"The Nazis were socialists, and it showed in many of the policies they implemented after coming to power in 1933. First, like the Soviets, the Nazis initiated a war on private property. Not surprisingly, property rights were severely curbed by National Socialism in the name of public welfare.
How did the National Socialists combat private property in Germany? The first step came shortly after the Nazis took control, when they abolished private property. Article 153 of the Weimar constitution guaranteed private property, with expropriation only to occur within the due process of the law, but this article was nullified by a decree on February 28, 1933.
"With this, the new National Socialist government had complete control of private property in Germany. While they did not take complete control of the lands like the Bolsheviks did in Russia in 1917, the Nazis issued quotas for industries and farms, and later they reorganized all industry into corporations run by members of the Nazi Party. "
"Peter Temin wrote about this in Soviet and Nazi Economic Planning, stating:
Both governments reorganized industry into larger units, ostensibly to increase state control over economic activity. The Nazis reorganized industry into 13 administrative groups with a larger number of subgroups to create a private hierarchy for state control. The state could therefore direct a firm’s activities without acquiring direct ownership of enterprises. The pre-existing tendency to form cartels was encouraged to eliminate competition that would destabilize prices."
https://mises.org/mises-wire/yes-they-were-socialists-how-nazis-waged-war-private-property
"If we look at the Nazi program, this isn’t quite what comes to mind. Its dominant theme is that the German people have to come together as a collective entity: the common good must be put before the individual good. Differences in class and wealth must be strictly subordinated to the good of the German people (Volk) as a whole. Points 10 and 11 of the program declare:"
"The first obligation of every citizen must be to productively work mentally or physically. The activity of individual may not clash with the interests of the whole, but must proceed within the framework of the whole for the benefit for the general good. We demand therefore: Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery."
https://mises.org/friday-philosophy/yes-nazis-were-socialists
