Citat:
Framförallt orchernas ständiga tjat, ända sedan våren förra året om att allting, från dåligt väder till kritik av det konstanta ryzka dopingmissbruket inom professionell tävlingssport, skulle vara någon sorts "röd linje" som omedelbart måste svaras med kärnvapen... 
Ryzzland är ett U-land som styrs av en maffia! Självklart ljuger det och ska spela tufft och arrogant vid varje givet tillfälle? Det är upp till omvärlden att förstå att man bara har att göra med en nio-årig mobbare som säger allt det kan för att med hotelser försöka komma undan ansvar och konsekvenser!
Givetvis kommer Ivan inte starta något kärnvapenkrig; han vet att den förste som skulle utplånas i det är han själv...https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1539998518017941506.html
Citat:
Russia attacks not when it is "provoked", but in an opposite case: when it feels stronger than the opponent
Balterna påtalade alldeles utmärkt information om ämnet ganska nyligen, även om det egentligen är gamla saker vi redan känner till:
https://twitter.com/BadBalticTakes/status/1672858603059924995
Citat:
One important lesson from yesterday is that all supporters of Russia are VERY flexible with their beliefs.
This isn’t just about this war. Russia consistently lies itself into aggression where it senses weakness and lies itself out of aggression when it encounters strength.
So - the lesson for the world - is to stop talking about the need to avoid humiliating russia. It has no shame. If you feed its aggression, it will explain why it’s even more aggrieved. If you stand up to it, it will explain itself why it’s totally not humiliated at all while backing down.
- Both sides insisted the other was an extreme threat to the very existence of russia yet very few people actually picked a side, preferring to just wait and see whoever triumphed in order to believe whichever narrative becomes official.
( Vilket f.ö. helt bekräftar följande avhandling om det ryzka tankesättet och nationalandan: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1667916593714667523.html] ) - Both sides insisted they would be totally uncompromising in punishing their opponents, right up to the moment they compromised and went away, leaving russian propagandists to explain why the whole mutiny thing really wasn’t such a big deal.
- Then there’s the tech bro vatniks like Musk and his friends who are happy to conclude the whole thing was all about them and just another show (or “current thing”) somehow organised to distract from some petty US political squabble that’s somehow the real news story in their bubble.
- Oh, and remember we were supposed to believe that you must never corner Putin. That reputation of what he does when cornered was carefully crafted over decades using some childhood story about Putin encountering a cornered rat. Apparently, the rat must have fled to a bunker before issuing compromises too if Putin did actually learn anything from it.
- Insisted the full scale invasion was a crazy western conspiracy theory before then justifying it.
- Insisted every new type of weapons delivery to Ukraine was an escalation that crosses a red line before claiming the delivered weapons won’t change anything.
- Insisted occupied territory would be “russia forever” before justifying tactical regroupings and goodwill gestures.
This isn’t just about this war. Russia consistently lies itself into aggression where it senses weakness and lies itself out of aggression when it encounters strength.
So - the lesson for the world - is to stop talking about the need to avoid humiliating russia. It has no shame. If you feed its aggression, it will explain why it’s even more aggrieved. If you stand up to it, it will explain itself why it’s totally not humiliated at all while backing down.
__________________
Senast redigerad av zergrush 2023-06-26 kl. 05:07.
Senast redigerad av zergrush 2023-06-26 kl. 05:07.
