Citat:
Den där siffran (40.000) har ju cirkulerat i media ett tag, men du verkar ha missat det.
Anledningen till varför man vill öka antalet så kraftigt (till över 300.000) är att den insatsberedda styrkan ska vara så slagkraftig att Putin inte ens överväger ett anfall. Alla scenarion ska sluta med ett snabbt nederlag för Putin. Och han ska veta om det.
"deterrence by denial"
som Sky News skrev i en artikel häromdagen:
Citat:
If Russia tried to invade it 'would be wiped off the earth'
This changed appreciation of the threat is changing NATO's policy on how to deter it. The allies look set to move away from relying purely on the threat of punishment being enough to stop President Putin from acting, to what some are calling "deterrence by denial".
Kusti Salm explained it would work by having troops in larger numbers already on the ground to stop any invasion before it started.
"You are able to put up adequate, sufficient forces and you indicate to your potential adversary that the force-overmatch is on a level that you would lose immediately".
"This message should translate into a loss of their willingness to invade... Russia can read from it that even if they tried they would be wiped off the earth in the first few hours."
https://news.sky.com/story/nato-set-to-agree-biggest-overhaul-of-defences-since-the-cold-war-including-expansion-of-40-000-stro ng-response-force-12638817
This changed appreciation of the threat is changing NATO's policy on how to deter it. The allies look set to move away from relying purely on the threat of punishment being enough to stop President Putin from acting, to what some are calling "deterrence by denial".
Kusti Salm explained it would work by having troops in larger numbers already on the ground to stop any invasion before it started.
"You are able to put up adequate, sufficient forces and you indicate to your potential adversary that the force-overmatch is on a level that you would lose immediately".
"This message should translate into a loss of their willingness to invade... Russia can read from it that even if they tried they would be wiped off the earth in the first few hours."
https://news.sky.com/story/nato-set-to-agree-biggest-overhaul-of-defences-since-the-cold-war-including-expansion-of-40-000-stro ng-response-force-12638817
Citat:
Well, my friend, I need no map to know where it's going. You see, some of us make maps to be what they are to suit the matter in a long term result. And when it comes to Russia winning against Ukraine...if seen through a 1600's perspective yes, but now it isn't so, and of course will never be. So your win is what we call a hope for the buoy to come drifting by on the open sea. Lotto generates a bigger chance than that. And if you for some reason declares my argumentation to halt or be faulty, well, think thrice 
Kanske en intressant vinkel, dock inte i denna tråd. Håll dig till saken. Och skriv på svenska.
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera