Citat:
Absolut. Så är det ju.
Citat:
Ja du har mycket rätt. Här kan du läsa om nackdelarna och fördelar.
https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/technical-reflections-russias-armoured-fighting-vehicles
Rätt organiserade och tränade så skulle nog resultatet bli ett annat
"For example, the poor performance of Iraq’s Russian-made T-72 tanks during Operation Desert Storm led many analysts to question their utility against Western main battle tanks. However, subsequent simulations of the Battle of 73 Easting run using the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory’s JANUS system showed that when the Iraqi crews were modelled as using effective combined arms tactics including reconnaissance and infantry support, they inflicted 50 vehicle losses – over 70% of the 2nd Armoured Cavalry Regiment’s strength at the battle – despite losing overall. This was despite the model incorporating the M1 Abrams’ advantages in areas such as range and thermal sights, as well as the effects of US air supremacy. Overall, Russian armour is relatively capable; it must contend with past design decisions that can expose the crew to risk, but images of destroyed tanks rarely provide an idea of the impact that vehicles had upon the fighting before they were destroyed. It is therefore important to put Russian armour into context and understand that it is likely more capable at a technical level than the war in Ukraine suggests." (Länken ovan)
Jag har sett en video där en ukrainsk BMP framgångsrikt bekämpar samtidigt flera ryska T-72. Bra taktik och duktig besättning
https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/technical-reflections-russias-armoured-fighting-vehicles
Rätt organiserade och tränade så skulle nog resultatet bli ett annat
"For example, the poor performance of Iraq’s Russian-made T-72 tanks during Operation Desert Storm led many analysts to question their utility against Western main battle tanks. However, subsequent simulations of the Battle of 73 Easting run using the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory’s JANUS system showed that when the Iraqi crews were modelled as using effective combined arms tactics including reconnaissance and infantry support, they inflicted 50 vehicle losses – over 70% of the 2nd Armoured Cavalry Regiment’s strength at the battle – despite losing overall. This was despite the model incorporating the M1 Abrams’ advantages in areas such as range and thermal sights, as well as the effects of US air supremacy. Overall, Russian armour is relatively capable; it must contend with past design decisions that can expose the crew to risk, but images of destroyed tanks rarely provide an idea of the impact that vehicles had upon the fighting before they were destroyed. It is therefore important to put Russian armour into context and understand that it is likely more capable at a technical level than the war in Ukraine suggests." (Länken ovan)
Jag har sett en video där en ukrainsk BMP framgångsrikt bekämpar samtidigt flera ryska T-72. Bra taktik och duktig besättning
Jadå, väldigt mycket handlar om en motiverad, välutbildad och modig besättning, god ledning på kompani, bataljon och brigadnivå, samt gott planerat underhåll av vagnar och system. Med sådant kan man få så gott som alla vagnar att prestera åtminstone hjälpligt.
Självklart är det så att om man sladdar runt som en nackad höna på platser där inga stridsvagnar bör befinna sig utan att infanteri eller annat understöd först rensat området (som ryssarna ack så ofta verkar göra), så spelar det i slutänden ingen roll vilken vagn du sitter i. Du kommer att få en smäll.
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera