Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
DikT
Han har defacto varit frihetsberövad i snart 10 år utan att åtalas för någonting (annat än borgensbrott för en utredning som sedan lades ner).
Helt sjukt.
Det ska vara:
Annat än för det mycket grova borgensbrottet som ledde till förundersökningen lades ner, då den långa obstruktionen av JA gjorde att stödbevisningens värde hade reducerats allt för mycket. Borgensbrottet tillsammans med övrig obstruktion av JA gjorde bägge kvinnorna helt rättslösa. Straffet för borgensbrottet var i underkant. Brittiska domaren ansåg även att brottet var så grovt att det låg utanför straffskalan som alltså inte ansågs räcka till.
Från domen:
Citat:
Firstly, by entering the Embassy, you deliberately put yourself out of reach, whilst remaining in the UK. You remained there for nearly 7 years, exploiting your privileged position to flout the law and advertise internationally your disdain for the law of this country. Your actions undoubtedly affected the progress of the Swedish proceedings. Even though you did co-operate initially, it was not for you to decide the nature or extent of your co-operation with the investigations. They could not be effectively progressed, and were discontinued, not least because you remained in the Embassy.
Secondly, your continued residence in the Embassy has necessitated a concentration of resources, and expenditure of £16 million of taxpayers’ money in ensuring that when you did leave, you were brought to justice. It is essential to the rule of law that nobody is above or beyond the reach of the law. Orders of the Court are to be obeyed
Thirdly, you have not surrendered willingly. Had the Government of Ecuador not permitted entry to the Embassy, you would not have voluntarily come before the court.
Och
Citat:
It is difficult to envisage a more serious example of this offence.
