Valfusk under USA-valet 2020? Rapporterade incidenter.

Of the one hundred (100) duplicate ballots that were inspected and compared to their
“originals,” a ballot was identified where the original was clearly a vote for Trump, and the
duplicate ballot switched the vote to Biden.
A second ballot was also identified on which the original ballot was clearly a vote only
for Trump, but the duplicate ballot had a vote for both Trump and a “blank” write-in candidate,
causing the “Trump” vote to be cancelled (due to an “over-vote”).
There were no errors observed in the sample which granted a vote to Trump, or which
cancelled out a Biden vote.
Given the extremely small sample size – and the fact that candidates Trump and Biden
are apart by less than one half of one percent apart in the official statewide canvas (0.03%, or
zero point zero three percent)1 – a prima facie error rate of two percent against Trump alone is
obviously of serious concern.

Plaintiff therefore asks the Court to order that the inspection of duplicate ballots continue,
on a larger scale (of more ballots, e.g. 2,500), and that a trial of the matter be continued pending
its result.

IT IS ORDERED denying the relief requested in the Petition.

President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team has been blocked from meeting with leaders of U.S. intelligence agencies after the Trump administration rejected numerous requests, The Washington Post reports.

Arizona Legislature 'cannot and will not' overturn election, Republican House speaker says
Republican state Reps. Mark Finchem and Kelly Townsend spent much of the day imploring their fellow legislators on social media to overturn the election results in favor of President Donald Trump.

Bowers said such action would be both illegal and inappropriate.

"As a conservative Republican, I don’t like the results of the presidential election," Bowers said in a prepared statement. "I voted for President Trump and worked hard to reelect him. But I cannot and will not entertain a suggestion that we violate current law to change the outcome of a certified election."

He noted that such an action would violate the oath lawmakers took to uphold the U.S. and Arizona Constitutions, along with, "the basic principles of republican government and the rule of law if we attempted to nullify the people’s vote based on unsupported theories of fraud. Under the laws that we wrote and voted upon, Arizona voters choose who wins, and our system requires that their choice be respected."

Why Are Conservatives More Susceptible to Believing Lies?
An interplay between how all humans think and how conservatives tend to act might actually explain a lot about our current moment.

The Court ordered that counsel could review 100 duplicate ballots. Maricopa County
voluntarily made another 1,526 duplicate ballots available for review. These ballots do not
identify the voter so, again, there is no way to know how any individual voter voted. Of the
1,626 ballots reviewed, 9 had an error in the duplication of the vote for president.
Plaintiff called a number of witnesses who observed the duplication process as
credentialed election observers. There was credible testimony that they saw errors in which the
duplicated ballot did not accurately reflect the voter’s apparent intent as reflected on the original
ballot. This testimony is corroborated by the review of the 1,626 duplicate ballots in this case,
and it confirms both that there were mistakes in the duplication process, and that the mistakes
were few. When mistakes were brought to the attention of election workers, they were fixed.
The duplication process prescribed by the Legislature necessarily requires manual action
and human judgment, which entail a risk of human error. Despite that, the duplication process for
the presidential election was 99.45% accurate. And there is no evidence that the inaccuracies
were intentional or part of a fraudulent scheme. They were mistakes. And given both the small
number of duplicate ballots and the low error rate, the evidence does not show any impact on the
outcome.
The Court finds no misconduct, no fraud, and no effect on the outcome of the election.