Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
TAD2
Det märkliga var att FHM hade ju mätningar på andelen med antikroppar då. Runt 5 % i de första mätningarna. Varför inte lita på dem?
This is also something I brought up at the time. They skewed those results by using samples from vårdcentralen. This is one way they actively skewed the results higher. The second, which I must admit was not intentional on their behalf and that I cannot hold against them—the Abbott tests they used to measure the antibody rate they ended up recalling over an unacceptably high false-positive rate.
The fact that the parameters for the 5% alone fall within the CI for false results make the first round of tests void. The lack of a random sample population study only increase the lack of validity behind the study and subsequent studies.