Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
OUFCompulsive
Absolutely. The teams assumptions have been brought up in referencing studies and told that it needs a lot more evidence to make that claim. Further studies have shown which HCoV’s elicit cross-reactive T-cells and a further study has shown these cross-reactive T-cells either grant immunity from infection or any significant protection from the infection’s severity.
You have not proven me wrong, you’ve only doubled down on this study. And that is fine, but the study is being disproven. I’ve posted the studies bringing this study into question and about them extensively in the past twenty four hours. I don’t think their assumptions of a 2x immunity will go to print. I don’t even think their 1.1 recent infection ratio will make it to print.
I also stand behind my predictions. How could I not? I gave figures for everything from a 0.5% IFR to a 1.3% IFR based on 50/60/70/82% infection rates required for herd immunity. I also included predictions on the results of hospital strain on the IFR up to a complete hospital collapse at around 3% IFR (everybody requiring hospitalization receives no treatment and the overwhelming majority die).
Well, THE studie shows there are three Times more infected than we're able to test.
This means that approximately 10-15% of Swedens population have been infected and this is making THE virus lose its grip.
You're right that it is yet to be proven of infected can be infected again within a few months, Or even a year.
But Common Sense say that should be The case. There Is Always a possibility that The immunity Will show to be a bad thing to have for a second infection.
But that it just would disappear, as you propose, that seems so unlikely that I don't think it is anything to go around AND worry about.