Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
OUFCompulsive
You once again confirm that you are too dumb to read the articles. One goes into length about how the IFR is a non-fixed scale that rises as the infection-rate increases and the other is a simply better and more nuanced aggregate for a global stratified IFR.
Both of these studies are ratified by other wide-scale antibody studies that find similarly high IFR’s with variance by region based on infection rates. Like studies in Italy, America, Belgium, Spain etc.
You have one study in The Lancet and an SVT article. Shotgun mouthwash check yourself before you keep spreading your incredibly false views as facts. Remember why this debate started?
It started because you wanted Europe to open up completely and allow herd immunity to happen. I told you that’s an incredibly dumb fucking idea, not least because of the amount of deaths — considering the IFR will land at 1%. You posted several small-scale studies and jerked off a debunked study, an SVT article and your Lancet study you can’t stop bringing up. I’ve brought up multiple widescale studies explaining how the IFR increases with more widespread infection — because this is what we will end up seeing if your dumbfuck idea was to happen.
This is despite the roughly 3.6% that will require hospitalization and however many more that will have to live with chronic illness as a result. But every time I point out any of this, you crawl back into your small-minded shell and spam the thread further with your wasteman facts. You cannot read the studies because they are evidently above you. You cannot somehow understand that by posting your lower IFR small-scale studies (which also run into multitudes of problems with audience bias and false-positive prevalence) you are only confirming the theory I’ve presented you with, but that is also above you — as I mentioned before.
I have now gone through and debunked every one of your points over the length of our debate. From your viruses always become less lethal bullshit claim to everything else you pour out.
Don’t make me pull out the Ulf reply checklist again.
We don’t believe you. You need more people.
Du kommer ju dock inte ifrån att precis ALLT talar för en dödlighet på långt under 1%.
Om vi tar ett SNITT på de stora rapporter som finns i ämnet så hamnar vi alltså på en dödlighet på 0,75%.
Vilket sannolikt är alldeles för högt när detta är över då dödligheten alltid sjunker vad gäller nya virus.
Så 0,6% eller lägre ligger såklart närmare till hands som Kina, Sverige, Hong Kong, Tyskland, UK M.fl redan kommit fram till i diverse rapporter.
Med tanke på den allt större asymptomatiska smittan som verkar råda och som uppdagas hela tiden så finns det ju ingen anledning att misstro alla dessa rapporter.
Och i ansedda The Lancet hävdade en mycket väl genomarbetad studie en dödlighet på 0,66%.
Vad vi ser nu, runt om i världen är nya rekord dagligen vad gäller smittade globalt sett medans dödligheten snarare går åt det andra hållet. Den minskar.
Vilket också talar för att sjunkande dödlighet i förlängningen.