Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Ulf-Utredaren
Bullshit. Det finns vetenskapliga studier om detta i den ansedda The Lancet och även FHM kom fram till samma sak.
Dödligheten kommer dessutom med största sannolikhet att sjunka ifrån 0,6%
Att sitta och hitta på egna siffror kommer du ingen vart med när det finns vetenskapliga artiklar i ämnet postade i The Lancet.
I can dig out articles from The Lancet telling you that every attempt at figuring out an IFR is bullshit, including every single one published in The Lancet.
Why are you holding tight to one study instead of looking into several? FHM’s first guess was 0.025%, then 0.1%, then 0.2%, then 0.4% and now it is 0.6%. You cannot be so naive as to think that they will not declare the IFR to be higher given time. The question is, will you then change your opinion on what the IFR is or will you stand with a 0.6% IFR because of one study?