Citat:
Allting är elektriskt. Stöt inkluderas. Jag skrev inte "elektriskt universum" av en slump. Finns massor av observationer på det elektriska. Ingenting av gravitationen. Men det elektriska kallar du "magiskt".Kung Adolfs elektricitet är knappast det som vi andra kallar elektricitet för det som vi vanliga kallar elektricitet får man stötar av och den går dessutom att mäta med t ex en voltmeter. Hans ”magiska” tyngdkraftselektricitet är tillräckligt stark för att få stenbumlingar på tusentals ton att dras till marken men är inte kapabel att ge en stöt som ens kittlar i fingrarna. Den påverkar dessutom icke elektriskt ledande material som keramik lika mycket som elektriskt ledande och magnetiska material. Denna elektricitet kanske finns i landet Narnia men knappast i vårt universum.
Till den som är intresserad. Mycket text dom första 10minuterna i citatet under;
https://youtu.be/lkvA9LjjGio
Citat:
GRAVITATION:
"..First of all, Newton's gravity was an inward pulling force which was due to the amount of mass it had, the greater the mass the stronger the gravity and therefor the stronger the pull.
This fallacy was created by Newton when he added in a purely ad hoc manner to the product of two masses by Kepler's orbital equations thereby forcing the interpretation that mass creates gravity. Parries bolter has proved in her work that Newton was wrong and that adding masses to the equation in fact produces invalid results in the range of magnitudes which are exponentially off when Kepler's orbital equation is used for the same motions, the sums of the sums all tally ought to be the same proving Newton was wrong when he added the mass to his gravity formulas and that mass does not create gravity since gravity does not exist."
.."Let me rephrase what that means."
"What it means is that Kepler's three laws of motion on planetary motion were done by mathematical observations. Observing nature as it is and observing the stars and observing the planets as they happen and doing mathematical equations, and what they're saying is that Newton added to that equation the product of mass, so he added a new element to that equation and when he did that he was incorrect and so basically what we call gravity or the term of gravity is actually not gravity at all.
It's a product of electricity, so Robert Otay has gone and explained that the universe is electrical in nature and that gravity is not a force and that the only force that actually does exist in the universe is electricity."
"..First of all, Newton's gravity was an inward pulling force which was due to the amount of mass it had, the greater the mass the stronger the gravity and therefor the stronger the pull.
This fallacy was created by Newton when he added in a purely ad hoc manner to the product of two masses by Kepler's orbital equations thereby forcing the interpretation that mass creates gravity. Parries bolter has proved in her work that Newton was wrong and that adding masses to the equation in fact produces invalid results in the range of magnitudes which are exponentially off when Kepler's orbital equation is used for the same motions, the sums of the sums all tally ought to be the same proving Newton was wrong when he added the mass to his gravity formulas and that mass does not create gravity since gravity does not exist."
.."Let me rephrase what that means."
"What it means is that Kepler's three laws of motion on planetary motion were done by mathematical observations. Observing nature as it is and observing the stars and observing the planets as they happen and doing mathematical equations, and what they're saying is that Newton added to that equation the product of mass, so he added a new element to that equation and when he did that he was incorrect and so basically what we call gravity or the term of gravity is actually not gravity at all.
It's a product of electricity, so Robert Otay has gone and explained that the universe is electrical in nature and that gravity is not a force and that the only force that actually does exist in the universe is electricity."
Citat:
WHAT MAKES OBJECT FALL
"...the motions of nature move in spheres and rings and all bodies seem to move in spiraling corkscrewing arcs... so the planetary motions that we've been taught by Newton, copernicus and even Einstein is incorrect...
They're sort of a limited 2d dimension dimensional approach to the movements that we actually see by real observation in nature..."
..And the most common number to see that is the Phi ratio 1.618 which shows that the most common building block in structures in nature is this spiraling..
Constantly arcing, constantly curving.."
"These Spirals represent electricity because light moves in waves and so do the growth of all manifestation, so the electrical current that we see which we could call light of manifestation moves in spiraling vortexes imploding, always nestling inward towards its center and one side of this spiral is male and the other side is female.
They're called twin opposing vortices and they actually seek each other, the seek to mate so to speak.... or they seek balance, or they seek equilibrium which is right in the center of this which is actually not a point at all, there's nothing in the center there there is no matter in the center there.. there's actually a place of stillness and electrical current is always looking for stillness, rest or equilibrium. All things in nature are looking for equilibrium..
..When we see things fall, like a rock falls to the ground..
What that actually is, is not a force at all, its not gravity... Its not two masses being attracted to each other based on their mass.... That's what Newton said and Einstein followed that up..
What is actually happening is, there's a shaft of like the eye of the storm in the tornado, there's a shaft of stillness that runs right through the middle of these vortices and it's totally still, it's actual stillness.
So as Electric current spins around itself it creates like the eye of the storm that creates a shaft of stillness and all electric current is seeking that Center, or seeking that stillness so when objects fall to towards each other like a rock falling towards Earth. It's one's objects Electric Vortex the way its wound up seeking rest or equilibrium in its closest nearest equipotential which would be the earth in this case so if a rock falls to earth..
The earth is electric, two spinning vortices, make-female.. Keeping the whole thing in manifestation spinning what we call 3d dense-matter and the rock is the same things, it's 3d and it's actually seeking rest based on its center stillness seeking rest in the Earth's center stillness.. And so all things are actually moving towards each other based on their electric equipotential or their greatest chance for stillness or rest.
And this is what we see if we look at nature, all manifestation appears to come out of darkness, come out of nothingness which is actually stillness and then it comes into manifestation, it forms a body at whatever density , could be a gas body, a liquid body or a full matter body and eventually that body gets dissolved.
Like our bodies do and they turn to dust and they actually just go back into where they came from which we could call darkness but it's actually not darkness, its stillness... which in Rosellian science is still magnetic light, now that light now being magnetic is still and it appears to us as darkness but just because we don't see it with our senses coloured light doesnt mean it's not light so its still magnetic light.."
"...the motions of nature move in spheres and rings and all bodies seem to move in spiraling corkscrewing arcs... so the planetary motions that we've been taught by Newton, copernicus and even Einstein is incorrect...
They're sort of a limited 2d dimension dimensional approach to the movements that we actually see by real observation in nature..."
..And the most common number to see that is the Phi ratio 1.618 which shows that the most common building block in structures in nature is this spiraling..
Constantly arcing, constantly curving.."
"These Spirals represent electricity because light moves in waves and so do the growth of all manifestation, so the electrical current that we see which we could call light of manifestation moves in spiraling vortexes imploding, always nestling inward towards its center and one side of this spiral is male and the other side is female.
They're called twin opposing vortices and they actually seek each other, the seek to mate so to speak.... or they seek balance, or they seek equilibrium which is right in the center of this which is actually not a point at all, there's nothing in the center there there is no matter in the center there.. there's actually a place of stillness and electrical current is always looking for stillness, rest or equilibrium. All things in nature are looking for equilibrium..
..When we see things fall, like a rock falls to the ground..
What that actually is, is not a force at all, its not gravity... Its not two masses being attracted to each other based on their mass.... That's what Newton said and Einstein followed that up..
What is actually happening is, there's a shaft of like the eye of the storm in the tornado, there's a shaft of stillness that runs right through the middle of these vortices and it's totally still, it's actual stillness.
So as Electric current spins around itself it creates like the eye of the storm that creates a shaft of stillness and all electric current is seeking that Center, or seeking that stillness so when objects fall to towards each other like a rock falling towards Earth. It's one's objects Electric Vortex the way its wound up seeking rest or equilibrium in its closest nearest equipotential which would be the earth in this case so if a rock falls to earth..
The earth is electric, two spinning vortices, make-female.. Keeping the whole thing in manifestation spinning what we call 3d dense-matter and the rock is the same things, it's 3d and it's actually seeking rest based on its center stillness seeking rest in the Earth's center stillness.. And so all things are actually moving towards each other based on their electric equipotential or their greatest chance for stillness or rest.
And this is what we see if we look at nature, all manifestation appears to come out of darkness, come out of nothingness which is actually stillness and then it comes into manifestation, it forms a body at whatever density , could be a gas body, a liquid body or a full matter body and eventually that body gets dissolved.
Like our bodies do and they turn to dust and they actually just go back into where they came from which we could call darkness but it's actually not darkness, its stillness... which in Rosellian science is still magnetic light, now that light now being magnetic is still and it appears to us as darkness but just because we don't see it with our senses coloured light doesnt mean it's not light so its still magnetic light.."
Detta har varit en av de djupare agendorna hela tiden. Dölja fri energi för oss och dölja en intelligent skapare.
Energi/elektricitet GÅR aldrig rakt. Det är i denna energi ljus färdas. Så många lögner.
"Spiraling corkscrewing..."
Vatten, elektricitet/elektromagnetiskt rör sig i spiraliserande virvlar. Det är via sin virvel vattnet får sin elektricitet och sin energi.
Implosion använder sig naturen av. Detta ger energi.
Fri/oändligt med energi har vi i naturen, av naturen.
__________________
Senast redigerad av Kungadolf 2018-11-30 kl. 15:08.
Senast redigerad av Kungadolf 2018-11-30 kl. 15:08.
