Citat:
Det är pinsamt i högsta grad att du uttalar dig om saker (MINSK2 avtalet) som du uppenbarligen inte har en susning om.
Från en artikel från febr 2016, som fortfarande är högst aktuell, då Kiev kriminella regimen ingenting implementerat:
...there is a dispute over which side in the Ukrainian crisis is failing to fulfill its obligations under the agreement, with Washington and Brussels accusing Russia of failing to pressure the Donbass to abide by the agreement. There is a simple way to resolve this dispute: referencing the agreement’s text and examining the parties’ post-agreement compliance.
The first three points deal with the ceasefire and the withdrawal of Kiev and Donbass forces from the line of contact. Both the ceasefire and withdrawal were achieved last spring.
The fourth point in Minsk-2 stipulates: “On the first day following the withdrawal a dialogue (between Kiev and Donbass representatives) is to begin with respect to the modalities of the local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the Law of Ukraine ‘On the temporary order of local government in certain areas of the Donetsk and the Lugansk regions,’ as well as with respect to the future operation of these areas on the basis of the Law.”
Kiev did not fulfill this pivotal step –the first in the agreement with a specific deadline.
Kiev has refused to engage a dialogue with the Donbass rebel regions’ representatives
Kiev was the first to violate and has been in violation of Minsk-2 since the second day after the implementation of the mutual troop withdrawals last year (2015, min anm).
...Kiev also violated Minsk-2’s fifth point or article, which reads: “Immediately, and not later than 30 days from the date of signing of this document, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine is to adopt a resolution with the specification of the territory covered by the special regime provided for in the Law of Ukraine ‘On the temporary order of local government in certain areas of the Donetsk and the Lugansk regions,’ (such territory) to be based on the line set out in the Minsk Memorandum of September 19, 2014.” The stipulation that Kiev consult—i.e. negotiate—in dialogue with Donbass representatives on the law ‘On the temporary order of local government, etc. is reiterated in Minsk-2’s article 12. Instead of dialogue on the temporary local government law, on 17 March 2015 the Verkhovna Rada passed unilaterally a corresponding resolution, having failed to consult with the Donbass rebels’ representatives in a “dialogue,” as stipulated in the Minsk agreement.
Article 11 of Minsk-2 requires Kiev to adopt a new constitution “with entry into force by the end of 2015 of a new constitution, which shall incorporate decentralization as a key element (taking into account the characteristics of certain areas of the Donetsk and the Lugansk regions, to be agreed upon with the representatives of these areas), as well as, before the end of 2015, adoption of permanent legislation with respect to the special status of certain areas of the Donetsk and the Lugansk regions in accordance with the measures specified in the Note.”
Neither a new constitution or a law on decentralization and the other issues listed in the Note have been adopted by Kiev.
Neither has Kiev lifted the blockade to the separatist Donbass regions, reopened Ukrainian banking in those regions, nor issued the across-the-board amnesty for the rebels required by the agreement.
Thus, from 17 March 2015 Kiev has been in violation of no less than seven articles and nine obligations it signed on to under the Minsk-2 accord.
Until the West pressures Kiev to address its neo-fascist problem and stop supporting the radicals’ ideological orientation as state ideology, the Poroshenko administration and any successor will fail to comply with Minsk-2. So the next question is: Do Washington and Brussels want Minsk-2 to succeed or do they prefer the ‘frozen conflict’ status quo and why?
http://gordonhahn.com/2016/02/19/whos-more-in-violation-of-minsk-2-kiev-or-donbass/
Förklara hur ska Moskva följa Minsk2 avtalet som du kräver, när i avtalet upptas KIEVregimens skyldigheter inte Moskvas
__________________
Senast redigerad av zy45N 2017-05-10 kl. 23:17.
Senast redigerad av zy45N 2017-05-10 kl. 23:17.
