Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
MrSkargard
Från samma artikel:
Han verkar alltså inte vara lika negativt inställd till Iran-dealen som exempelvis Mike Pompeo.
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Regulus
Fast han säger också i artikeln du citerade:
Mattis offered little praise for the nuclear deal, saying it's far from "a friendship treaty," but also dismissed Republican claims that the international agreement should be torn up by the next president.
På den punkten är han alltså mer moderat än Trump. Kanske för att han inser vad konsekvenserna av att riva upp avtalet skulle bli både för USA:s ställning i Mellanöstern och relationerna till EU och de andra NATO-länderna.
Det är sant. Men Mattis utmålar Iran som det i särklass största problemet i Mellanöstern just nu och det innebär rimligtvis att han vill göra något åt saken. Han
upprepar också den gamla trötta neokonservativa propagandalögnen om att Iran vill "utplåna Israel" och verkar anse att IS inte alls är något problem jämfört med Iran:
Citat:
As for the Sunni-dominated force controlling parts of Syria and Iraq, “I consider ISIS [another name for the Islamic State] just an excuse for Iran,” a largely Shi’ia nation. “The one country in the Middle East that has not been attacked by ISIS is Iran.”
Frågan är om han i det nyss citerade uttalandet till och med anklagar Iran för att ligga bakom IS.
Tydligen fick Mattis lämna befattningen som befälhavare för de amerikanska styrkorna i Mellanöstern i förtid därför att han ansågs vara för extrem i sin fientlighet mot Iran:
Citat:
Ret. Marine Gen. James Mattis, who oversaw U.S. forces in the Middle East from 2010 to 2013, was among the most insistent voices inside the military pushing for a policy focused on punishing Iran and its proxies.
Mattis lobbied for more interdictions of ships and planes carrying Iranian arms to battlefields such as Yemen and Syria, said former defense officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss policy deliberations. And Mattis pressed for more covert actions to capture or kill Iranian operatives, especially after the foiled 2011 plot by Iran to kill the Saudi ambassador at a Washington restaurant.
The former defense officials said plans to punish Tehran were often sidelined over concerns that they could disrupt negotiations to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.
“The Iranians showed that they could intervene everywhere even as they were negotiating on the nuclear issue,” said Ilan Goldenberg, who served as the Iran Team Chief in the Pentagon. Mattis’s pressing on the issue caused him to fall out of favor with the White House and ultimately led to his leaving command early, the former defense officials said.
“Some of Mattis’s ideas probably went too far,” Goldenberg said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/as-sectarian-chaos-spreads-obamas-middle-east-policy-buckles/2015/03/28/f8cc8f56-d570-11e4-a62f-ee745911a4ff_story.html
Mattis vill rent generellt se en mer aggressiv amerikansk utrikespolitik:
Citat:
Speaking in Washington, D.C., retired Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis said, “the perception is we’re pulling back” on America’s commitment to its allies and partners, leaving them adrift in a changing world. “We have strategic atrophy.”
Och verkar föga förvånande även ha en hökaktig inställning till Ryssland:
Citat:
He said Russia’s military moves against its neighbors—taking Crimea and backing separatists in Ukraine is “much more severe, more serious” than Washington and the European Union are treating it.
https://news.usni.org/2015/05/14/mattis-u-s-suffering-strategic-atrophy