Resultat:
Vem skulle du rösta på i amerikanska valet?
| Trump |
|
1179 röster |
| Clinton |
|
274 röster |
| Johnson |
|
53 röster |
| Stein |
|
55 röster |
| Annan |
|
184 röster |
http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/usavalet2016/article23803484.ab
Detta är ytterligare en anledning att rösta för Trump.
Att sparka tusentals anställda går bra- men Clinton förtjänar privatplan och 12 miljoner kronor, jodå det har vi alltid råd med
jävla äckliga Ericsson. Samma man hade praktikanter suga av honom i vita huset, men "feministiska sverige" bryr sig ej om sådant 
Detta är ytterligare en anledning att rösta för Trump.
Att sparka tusentals anställda går bra- men Clinton förtjänar privatplan och 12 miljoner kronor, jodå det har vi alltid råd med
jävla äckliga Ericsson. Samma man hade praktikanter suga av honom i vita huset, men "feministiska sverige" bryr sig ej om sådant
__________________
Senast redigerad av seeeg321 2016-10-28 kl. 16:52.
Senast redigerad av seeeg321 2016-10-28 kl. 16:52.
__________________
Senast redigerad av svallerbyttan 2016-10-28 kl. 17:43.
Senast redigerad av svallerbyttan 2016-10-28 kl. 17:43.
Experter och akademiker av det lite ovanligare slaget är intresserade av Donalds diverse egenheter! 
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=28610
http://qz.com/817886/i-pursued-her-like-a-strumpet-the-hazards-of-translating-trump-into-foreign-languages/
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/trump-feminine-speaking-style-214391
Det kommer finnas mycket kvar att studera och skriva om, när den här masspsykosen och valet väl är över.
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=28610
Citat:
Trumpchant in B Flat
Maybe the repeated performance of the same phrases in rally after rally is developing a chant-like groove.
Or is that chanted monotone meant to invoke some familiar pattern? A one-man demonstration chant? A really plain sort of plainchant? Some kind of magical incantation or Tony-Robbins-like affirmation? None of those really fit. Is there a model that I've never heard or am not thinking of?
Since YouTube has Trump rally recordings going back several years — and whatever happens on November 8, I'm sure we'll hear from Mr. Trump again — there's an opportunity here to study the evolution of a unique rhetorical style. It seems to work for him, though I think that any other politicians who spoke that way would be mercilessly ridiculed.
Maybe the repeated performance of the same phrases in rally after rally is developing a chant-like groove.
Or is that chanted monotone meant to invoke some familiar pattern? A one-man demonstration chant? A really plain sort of plainchant? Some kind of magical incantation or Tony-Robbins-like affirmation? None of those really fit. Is there a model that I've never heard or am not thinking of?
Since YouTube has Trump rally recordings going back several years — and whatever happens on November 8, I'm sure we'll hear from Mr. Trump again — there's an opportunity here to study the evolution of a unique rhetorical style. It seems to work for him, though I think that any other politicians who spoke that way would be mercilessly ridiculed.
http://qz.com/817886/i-pursued-her-like-a-strumpet-the-hazards-of-translating-trump-into-foreign-languages/
Citat:
Interpreters say it’s nearly “impossible” to translate Donald Trump’s rhetoric into other languages
Much has been made of Trump’s comments in a surfaced Access Hollywood video about making advances on a woman without her consent. Trump dismissed the comments as “locker talk,” but foreign language translations of the lewd banter have only made the remarks sound worse.
According to Victor Mair, a professor of Chinese at the University of Pennsylvania, the sentence, “I moved on her like a bitch, and I could not get there, and she was married,” became “Wǒ xiàng zhuī biǎozi yīyàng zhuī tā, dàn méi néng chénggōng,” on people.cn, which means: “I pursued her like a whore / prostitute / harlot / strumpet, but I couldn’t succeed.”
Another news site translated the sentence into, “Wǒ xiàng duìdài dàngfù yīyàng kàojìn tā,” or “I treated her like a slut to get close to her,” Mair wrote on the blog Language Log.
Much has been made of Trump’s comments in a surfaced Access Hollywood video about making advances on a woman without her consent. Trump dismissed the comments as “locker talk,” but foreign language translations of the lewd banter have only made the remarks sound worse.
According to Victor Mair, a professor of Chinese at the University of Pennsylvania, the sentence, “I moved on her like a bitch, and I could not get there, and she was married,” became “Wǒ xiàng zhuī biǎozi yīyàng zhuī tā, dàn méi néng chénggōng,” on people.cn, which means: “I pursued her like a whore / prostitute / harlot / strumpet, but I couldn’t succeed.”
Another news site translated the sentence into, “Wǒ xiàng duìdài dàngfù yīyàng kàojìn tā,” or “I treated her like a slut to get close to her,” Mair wrote on the blog Language Log.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/trump-feminine-speaking-style-214391
Citat:
Donald Trump Talks Like a Woman
And strange as it sounds, it might be one of the reasons he’s done as well as he has.
Jennifer Jones, a doctoral candidate of political psychology at the University of California at Irvine, has combined these statistics into an index capturing the ratio of “feminine” to “masculine” words, and applied it to the language of 35 political candidates over the past decade. Hillary Clinton’s language falls above the average on this index—more feminine than George W. Bush’s, but less so than Barack Obama’s.
But Donald Trump is a stunning outlier. His linguistic style is startlingly feminine, so much so that the chasm between Trump and the next most feminine speaker, Ben Carson, is about as great as the difference between Carson and the least feminine candidate, Jim Webb. And Trump earns his ranking not just because he talks a lot about himself or avoids big words (both of which are true); according to Jones, he also shows feminine patterns on the more subtle measures, such as his use of prepositions and articles. The key then is not what Trump talks about—making Mexico pay for the wall or bombing the hell out of ISIL—but rather how he says it.
And strange as it sounds, it might be one of the reasons he’s done as well as he has.
Jennifer Jones, a doctoral candidate of political psychology at the University of California at Irvine, has combined these statistics into an index capturing the ratio of “feminine” to “masculine” words, and applied it to the language of 35 political candidates over the past decade. Hillary Clinton’s language falls above the average on this index—more feminine than George W. Bush’s, but less so than Barack Obama’s.
But Donald Trump is a stunning outlier. His linguistic style is startlingly feminine, so much so that the chasm between Trump and the next most feminine speaker, Ben Carson, is about as great as the difference between Carson and the least feminine candidate, Jim Webb. And Trump earns his ranking not just because he talks a lot about himself or avoids big words (both of which are true); according to Jones, he also shows feminine patterns on the more subtle measures, such as his use of prepositions and articles. The key then is not what Trump talks about—making Mexico pay for the wall or bombing the hell out of ISIL—but rather how he says it.
Det kommer finnas mycket kvar att studera och skriva om, när den här masspsykosen och valet väl är över.
Ja, det sker onekligen snabba förändringar (korrigeringar) nu i mätningarna hos opinionsinstituten. 
Antar att dom vill vara ärliga nu med siffrorna, så att dom inte tappar allt förtroende när valresultatet kommer.
Antar att dom vill vara ärliga nu med siffrorna, så att dom inte tappar allt förtroende när valresultatet kommer.
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera