Förekommer organiserad gang stalking?

[quote=Ondahamstern|57578433]Att bli aggressiv direkt efter simpla frågor är inte ett normalt beteende som ser till att man blir trodd, om det nu är så att du är en TI så tjänar du absolut inte någonting på att aktivt inte försöka o gå igenom dina egna historier för att försäkra dig om att det inte finns hål i dem för om det finns hål i dem som jag kan hitta så finns det garanterat fler som försvarsadvokater kan finna.



Ja jag är helt säker på det dem pratar inte svenska! Det är dem som övervakar mig som pratar svenska Det var hon som sa det.



Jag lägger inte märke till dem eftersom jag inte förstår språket

Och vem är hon som du magiskt lyfter fram nu? (För nyss så var det de)





Men du har väl andra grannar eller hör du bara grannarna ovanför?

Edith fel siterat




Nej dem tre grannar ovanför är muslimer!

Nej, det är inte felciterat, du sa precis att det var en hon som sa att du hade fått en spruta, innan sa du att de hade sagt det så hur är det?





Jag har förstått att de är muslimer men det spelar ingen roll i detta fall då du ger intryck av att tramsa.

För vilken religion dina grannar har spelar ingen roll och att du klart och tydligt verkar haka upp dig på att du har muslimska grannar (har du frågat dem om de är muslimer eller antar du bara?) är inte ett gott tacken.

Jo du påstod att det var muslimerna! Som sa det! Det var hon som övervakar mig som sa det när jag vaknade! Dem har något rum i huset som dem arbetar i antingen hos muslimerna!



NEJ DET ÄR DU SOM TRAMSAR! JAG BESKRIVER BARA VAD SOM HÄNT!

DET SOM HAR HÄNT ÄR Att jag vaknar hör "att han har fått en spruta"
Tänker inte mycket på det fattar och kontrollerar kroppen ser en prick vid bäcken. Där vart dem brukar ge sprutor! Han har fått en spruta är inte slang för han har fått ligg som du vill få det!
DET ÄR INGEN SOM ANVÄNDER SLANG HÄR!

DU ÄR INTE HÄR FÖR ATT FÅ FRAM SANNINGEN DU ÄR HÄR FÖR ATT LEKA BESSERWISSER

Ja och säger saker som inte stämmer överens och blir aggressiv så fort folk ställer frågor, du klassas därmed som i bästa fall oseriös och i värsta fall som sjuk.




1. Du undviker frågan om du kan ha hört fel då du påstår dig vara nyvaken när du hör detta. (eller är du 100% vaken sedan tidigare?)

2. Var det en prick eller var det ett ömande märke? Och om det är en prick så bör du ha sett blod på sängkläder eller underkläder även om bara i små mängder.



1. Sluta fjanta nu, jag ställer gång på gång och tydligt dessutom om det inte finns en chans att du kan ha hört fel eller har du 100% felfri hörsel där du aldrig har hört fel?

2. Hur vet du att absolut ingen bland alla lägenheter använder slang? Termen han har fått sig ett sprut är ett välanvälanvänt uttryck och slang för just sex.


Nej, den som är här för att klart och tydligt sabotera är du, jag ställer simpla frågor, att du blir undvikande, otrevlig och börjar ljuga om vad andra säger på en enda gång bevisar att du inte bidrar med någonting för som jag redan har sagt om jag kan sticka hål på dina påståenden så kommer en försvarsadvokat att kunna göra det med stor lätthet.

Jag är relativt säker på att du ljuger och om det finns riktiga TIs där ute (eller överhuvudtaget) som läser här på flashback så bör de absolut inte ta dina historier som sanning.

Du vecklar ju in frågorna så det ser ut som jag har ingen koll!




Jag var vaken och utvillad.
Prick har inte undersökt sängkläder!


Jag har väldigt bra hörsel jag hörde vad jag hörde.
För att dem har inte sex på dagen när jag tänker efter har jag aldrig hört dem ha sex.
Jag hör dem dagligen och har aldrig hört någon som använder slang.

Jag orkar inte svara på alla frågor
Jag svär jag ljuger inte dem har försökt att döda mig många gånger sist försökte dem skjuta mig!

Hur ska du ha det när du talar med mig så har du inte nämnt något rop.
När jag kollar bakåt i inläggen så hittar jag detta.

Nu är du igång med en annan och då dyker ropen upp igen.

Du har en helgadering men kan du ge ett svar-

va förklara det var du som kom med rop! jag inte vaknat av något rop.
Jag vaknade självmant och hörde han har fått en spruta.

Nedan följer en intervju med en avhoppad torterare (intervjun är uppdelad i två delar).

Del 1 av 2

Secret Surveillance and Electromagnetic Torture by the Secret Services
Translation by Cyborg Nicholson on Peacepink

The story told by Carl Clark will partially take your breath away. The Englishman describes how
he targeted people and then became a target himself after he’d opted out. He also took part in
the deployment of microwave weapons in order to torture others, after which they were later
turned on him. “These criminal shenanigans need to be exposed in public so that they can be
stopped.” He describes below why he blew the whistle.

Interview with Carl Clark, Norfolk, England.
Armin Gross: Matters related to the secret services are usually not disclosed. You want to bring
them out in the open though. Who did you work for?
Carl Clark: I worked freelance from 1980 to 2003 for various secret services. I worked for the
American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) up to 1997. I then worked for the Israeli Secret
Services, Mossad and for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a US organisation against
discrimination and defamation of Jews. I was also employed by MI5, a subgroup of the British
Secret Services. I later moved to the Police Secret Services as well as to the secret services of an
investigation laboratory. I was deployed in European operations in Paris, Zurich, Berlin,
Dusseldorf, Munich, Madrid, Lyon, Bilbao and Moscow.
Armin Gross: What were your main assignments?
Carl Clark: An important assignment was to infiltrate certain groups to obtain inside
information about them. I would join certain groups, make friends with some of the members
and then proceed to ruin their lives.
Armin Gross: What kind of groups were they?
Carl Clark: First and foremost criminal gangs and drug cartels. I provided information about
the National Front, Nazis or skinheads to Israeli Secret Services. What they were interested in
were names, addresses, meeting places, projects and objectives. I tracked individual targets for
the CIA.
Armin Gross: What exactly did you do?
Carl Clark: I spied on people for long periods, eavesdropped on their conversations. I also had
orders to confuse or deceive them. I would therefore secretly force my way into their homes,
remove some things and just move others around. I would then delete data from their computer.
Or I would just drive them crazy, by following them and turning up close by either in the railway
station or the bus station, etc. Otherwise, I would stage a fight in the street right in full view of
the target’s eyes, and many other ploys. If our orders were to put somebody under more pressure
or even arrest them, I would install certain material on their computers such as child pornography,
instructions to manufacture a bomb, etc.
Armin Gross: What type of individuals were you instructed to target?
Carl Clark: People who were politically relevant. Likewise, people who opposed or acted
against the interests of large companies such as the pharmaceuticals. Some belonged to criminal
gangs, but there were two or three targets that had nothing on them at all as far as I could make
out.
Armin Gross: How many individuals did you have under surveillance in total?
Carl Clark: In the 80s it was five or six, in the 90s seven, and from 2000 to 2003, there were
three. You can appreciate from the low number of targets how intensive the targeting was. One
requires at least six months right at the outset to accumulate as much information as possible
about prospective targets’ past lives.
Armin Gross: How did you acquire this information?
Carl Clark: From the garbage can, the telephone, mail, the Internet. That sort of thing has got
much easier with recent advances in technology. Bugs are no longer necessary as you can
eavesdrop on mobile phones, ISDN phones or small parabolic receiving dishes nowadays.
Unfortunately, the deployment of microwave weapons has, in addition, become very practicable.

MICROWAVE WEAPONS
Armin Gross: Did you also use such weapons?
Carl Clark: No. I was responsible for surveillance. Colleagues from special departments did
this. However, I was at times on site when these weapons were deployed.
Armin Gross: Can you describe in more detail how the deployment of weapons took place?
Carl Clark: It’s a bit like what takes place in a science fiction movie. People can be tracked
anywhere by radar, satellite, a base station and complimentary computer programs. For example,
three radar devices would sometimes be positioned in the vicinit y of the target. The radar emits
electromagnetic waves, some of which pick up the target and the result is then evaluated. My
friends who work in the special department could then follow the target all day on their
computers. This form of localising the target made it easy to deploy the weapons accurately. My
colleagues could see exactly where to aim and also observe how the target reacted.
Armin Gross: What effect did the weapons have on the targets?
Carl Clark: They create heat, inner burns, pain, nausea, fear. Sometimes traces are left on the
skin, but mostl y not. If the targets go to the doctor, they get told ever ything is OK. Take into
account, this was the situation ten years ago. This technology has advanced considerably since
then.
Armin Gross: What is the objective of such attacks?
Carl Clark: The aim is to intimidate certain people, for example people who make a lot of
noise. I myself was under attack for three years after opting out. I’m virtually sure that weapons
were used against me in 2003/2004 which provoked strong aggression. I almost killed somebody
on two occasions, once a neighbour who was a pleasant elderly lady.

ATTEMPTS TO DRIVE PEOPLE TO INSANITY
Armin Gross: Do you think it’s possible to directly influence feelings by weaponising
electromagnetic rays?
Carl Clark: Without doubt. We know that living organism is sensitive to electromagnetic
radiation. Elementary life processes within cells function by biogenic electromagnetic
oscillation. Frequencies from the exterior can damage or change these processes. There have
already been far-reaching attempts at influencing body, mind and soul through frequencies
within the framework of military research. It’s possible to provoke fear, aggression, nervousness
or forgetfulness in this way. In combination with other interventions, a target can be driven
insane. For example, radiofrequency can be manipulated so that the target hears his own name on
the radio or his computer shows his name time and again. Voices are also specifically transmitted
to a target commenting on his activities. For example, I heard a voice in the morning after
getting up which said “Get up and injure somebody.”
Armin Gross: People are actually being driven to psychic extremes then?
Carl Clark: Yes, the undoubted goal is to have select people end up in psychiatric institutions. If a target seeks help by going to the police or to the doctor, they don’t get taken seriously. Some
doctors and hospitals actually work together with the Secret Services. Diagnostic directives
permit a patient who feels persecuted or hears voices to be classified as schizophrenic.
Armin Gross: Hospitals cooperate with the Secret Services?
Carl Clark: Yes, certainly. Large companies too. That’s why one lives dangerously if one
carries out investigations on large companies. The American State protects large companies like
MacDonald’s, Coca-Cola and certain pharmaceutical enterprises. These companies also have
FBI agents at their disposal for matters related to industrial espionage. The Freemasons who are
widespread within the CIA also play a major role.

ENORMOUS SURVEILLENCE NET
Armin Gross: Do you know in which countries individuals are under surveillance and are being
assaulted by energy weapons?
Carl Clark: The USA, Germany, China, North Korea, Russia, France and England, normally
without the official knowledge of the particular government. But unofficially, I believe that
government personnel must be involved in some way or know something about the goings-on.
Armin Gross: Do you know how many people are under surveillance?
Carl Clark: There are about 5,000 in England under surveillance and about 15,000 overseeing
the operation. Apart from the large Secret Service agencies, there are 300 or 400 minor Secret
Service agencies which were formed by former policemen or former Secret Service agents. They
have permission from the Home Office to spy, take photographs and procure information. Their
employees are well paid.
Armin Gross: Was it a problem for you to switch from one Secret Service agency to another?
Carl Clark: No. It was always a positive move from my new employer’s viewpoint as I could
always provide information to him about my previous Secret Service agency. The large Secret
Service agencies mistrust each other totally. I earned more money as a result.

Fortsättning; intervju med en avhoppad torterare (intervjun är uppdelad i två delar).

Del 2 av 2

OPTING OUT
Armin Gross: Why did you opt out?
Carl Clark: I saw that what I was doing was wrong. The last two targets that were allocated to
me had done nothing. They were not political, quite normal, nice people, not criminal or
economically dangerous. The only reason I could come up with for them having been selected as
targets was their DNA or their blood. There has recentl y been a lot of research done in this area.
The DNA is associated with the finest details of our character. The Human Genomes Project
between 1993 and 2004 analyzed all chemical base pairs which make up human DNA, also
collecting the genetic data of people from isolated communities in danger of extinction (Human
Genomes Diversity Project). The results were then all compared and correlated. Our employers
were always very keen on DNA analyses of the people under surveillance. It was always one of
our most important tasks in the initial period of surveillance to organize DNA or blood analyses
of these individuals.
Armin Gross: You’ve already mentioned that opting out in 2003 caused you problems. Can you
give a few examples?
Carl Clark: I was once followed by a helicopter through the night as I drove a truck 3,000 miles
to deliver packages. As I walked along an alley, I was attacked by a man who struck me a blow.
Then on another occasion, somebody removed three connections from my engine on the
motorway causing the engine to get dislodged and fall out of its casing. On another occasion as I
drove a truck with a three-ton load, two of my tyres suddenly exploded. When the police arrived,
they stated they’d never witnessed anything like it. Then there was the time when I was
followed over a great distance whilst driving. It made me so angry that I brought my car to an
abrupt halt, grabbed my baseball bat and got out of the car. Three cars which were tailing me
suddenly took off in reverse gear at great speed. In normal circumstances, they would have
reported my behaviour to the police, but these did not. On another occasion, I was sent three
people who were supposed to strike up a friendship with me in order to spy on me. As I knew
they were listening in on my telephone conversati ons, I stated loudly on the telephone to
somebody that I planned to kill the people who had wormed their way into my life. The three
individuals disappeared from the scene altogether after that.
Armin Gross: And what’s the current situation? Do you think you are still being targeted?
Carl Clark: Of course. I have also found out that the secret services wish to know why I flew to
Germany.
Armin Gross: Are you not then living dangerously at present?
Carl Clark: I am prepared to stand up to them. They also know that I know a lot about them,
and that I intend to do something about their violations or breaches. I have friends in special
units, people in Afghanistan and in Iraq that support me.

Tips for Victims of Surveillance.
Armin Gross: Have you any tips for people who feel they are under surveillance?
Carl Clark: It’s a good idea to avoid the use of certain terminology in emails such as
“government” or “mind control,” etc., because digital surveillance seeks out key, sought -after
vocabulary. It’s also an idea to check out whether anyone’s forced their way into your home.
Intruders often deploy anaesthetic gases sprayed through the letter box on a door for example
before they break in during the night. You’d just wake up in the morning with a metallic taste in
your mouth. If cars behave in a strange way, you should take note of the registration numbers. If
you receive letters you don’t recognise or expect, they should be wrapped in aluminium foil.
There are special measuring devices to detect high frequency rays in the home.
Armin Gross: Do you know of any other whistleblowers who have related stories similar to
yours?
Carl Clark: Up to now, no. But I hope that there will be more who are prepared to go public in
the future.

Länk: www.stopeg.com/doc/CarlClarkInterview.pdf

---

Se även följande video med Carl Clark (inspelad till Covert Harassment Conference i Berlin): http://www.covertharassmentconference.com/speaker?Carl_Clark

Så här står det på konferensens hemsida gällande Clarke:

"Experiences with harassment before and after working alongside the British Security Services
Carl became the hunted after falling out with his handlers and went through three years of harassment and targeting by his former mentors, it resulted in the breakdown of his marriage of 25 years before moving away from his home town of Norwich and settling in Thetford, where he became very popular and rebuilt his life.

Carl became a Local and District Councillor after being elected for his work with children and youth for the Labour Party, he then disagreed with some of their policies and represented the Christian Peoples Alliance, where he stood a candidate in the 2014 European Parliamentary elections in which he got over 11,000 votes and beat two of the opposing parties, due to a RTA (Road Traffic Incident) he was unable to stand in the U.K Parliamentary Elections in 2015 his injuries are still causing problems."

Det där med att att självskriva vad det handlar om och låta citat och länkar vara ett stöd är inget du tycker du är en bra regel