Stora tråden om Donald Trump [mod]

Egentligen så handlar ju det om Donald Trump vs Megyn Kelly. Allt började ju egentligen innan den första GOP-debatten:

"On July 27, as The Daily Beast’s Tim Mak and Brandy Zadrozny published a subsequently quickly-proven-false hit piece alleging that Trump raped his ex-wife Ivana Trump—with whom he had three children, Ivanka, Eric and Donald, Jr.—Kelly rushed it onto her show and into the political narrative. The story was posted online at 8:35 p.m. that evening on The Daily Beast’s website, too late for Kelly to have vetted it herself before going on air to read it—which she did gleefully that night, just leaning on the normally reliable Daily Beast to be able to use it on her show.

“We got to get to this because this is just breaking on the Daily Beast—the headline is: ‘Ex-Wife: Donald Trump Made Me Feel ‘Violated’ During Sex,’” Kelly said on air. “The next line is: ‘Ivana Trump once accused the real estate tycoon of “rape,” although she later clarified: not in the “criminal sense.””

As a photo of Ivana appeared on the right side of the screen and Stirewalt split the left with Kelly, Kelly continued: “And the essence of this piece, I’m just reading this literally as we are on the air, is that during their divorce proceeding—which was ugly—she accused him of a ‘violent assault,’ pulling back her arms, pulling out fistfuls of her hair, and then ‘raping’ her in a vicious manner.”

“Donald Trump has previously—this is back in 1989 this allegedly happened—he has denied it previously, years ago, saying it is obviously false and going after the guy who wrote it as a vindictive and jealous man,” Kelly said before eventually turning to Stirewalt. “Somebody who speaks for Donald Trump has come out and denied it as well and added that legally, he says, you cannot rape your spouse—although I’m not sure about that as a legal matter, we’ll leave that for another day—but what does this tell us now? What does this tell us? It’s getting ugly for one thing.”

“It’s getting ugly, for one thing,” Stirewalt replied, echoing Kelly before providing his analysis on the spot about the piece. “Number two, it’s old.”

“Very,” Kelly interjected.

“But in the case of Donald Trump, you have decades—reaching back to the 1980s—of a public life, and a colorful one at that,” Stirewalt continued before Kelly jumped in to talk over him and seemingly back the odd logic behind the Daily Beast publishing this old piece.

“But this is how you get around that, Chris—they start the article, all right, they start the article by saying, ‘Donald Trump introduced his presidential campaign to the world with a slur against Mexican immigrants, accusing them of being “rapists” and bringing crime into the country.’ And then they say this is ‘unfortunate turn of phrase for’ him and then they get into the matter from 1989 in a divorce proceeding—where the audience needs to understand, often both sides say very ugly things that may or may not be true,” Kelly said.

At the end of the segment, Kelly seemingly warned Trump about what she planned to do to him at the upcoming debate: “We see this happen, we see this happen a lot, you run for president, man, they will go after everything.”
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/08/28/megyn-kelly-the-first-casualty-in-donald-trumps-asymmetric-war-on-fox-news/

Nu skall i alla fall Donald Trump och Fox ha ett möte:

Fox News Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes and Donald Trump spoke this morning and plan to have a meeting next week to discuss their differences of opinion regarding Fox's coverage of Mr. Trump's presidential campaign.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRxcHvbUCsU

Det görs ett försök till analys här:

Meltdown mystery: GOP voters still like Scott Walker as poll numbers near zero

“What we watch (in public polls) is, ‘Where is his favorable, where is his unfavorable?’” said Walker strategist Ed Goeas in a recent interview. “In survey after survey after survey, with the exception of Ben Carson, (Walker) has the second best favorable/unfavorable ratio of all the candidates. If, in fact, this was something of voters reacting negatively to him, you would see his negatives going up and his positives going down.”

Walker has had lower negatives than many of his rivals — lower than Republicans such as Trump, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. In theory, that gives him a higher ceiling.

The bad news is that he seems to have a lower floor, too, hitting rock bottom at 1% or 2% in some recent state and national polls. That suggests not only that his support last spring was something of a mirage — soft and unsustainable — but that he lacks a bedrock base of firm support going forward.

“It's not like (GOP voters) suddenly don't like Scott Walker any more. They're just more excited about other people,” said Tom Jensen of Public Policy Polling, a Democratic firm that has polled frequently on the GOP race.

“Walker still has relatively low (negatives),” says Gallup’s Newport. “He doesn’t have to beat back a bad image, but he has to create an image.”"
http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/news/328432011.html

Ja där han bevisade att han är fruktansvärt barnslig som inte kan släppa något som var avklarat.

Som sagt tapar han FOX News så riskerar han att tappa den stora GoP väljarbasen.

Återigen visar du att du inte klarar av att läsa innantill. För Trumps del var ju det avklarat, som hans fd fru sa:

"His ex-wife Ivana–unprompted, he later told Breitbart News–issued a statement to CNN backing him up.

“I have recently read some comments attributed to me from nearly 30 years ago at a time of very high tension during my divorce from Donald,” Ivana said. “The story is totally without merit. Donald and I are the best of friends and together have raised three children that we love and are very proud of. I have nothing but fondness for Donald and wish him the best of luck on his campaign. Incidentally, I think he would make an incredible president.”"

Det var Megyn Kelly som drog upp det och som sedan försökte skylla ifrån sig:

"That night, in what appeared to be an effort to distance herself from the piece she previously rushed on air the night before, Kelly completely changed her tune as she badgered the Daily Beast’s Mak on her show. “Tim, you are under fire for writing a piece about a man’s divorce—allegations made in it—from three decades ago,” Kelly asked Mak. “Why did you think this was relevant?”"
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/08/28/megyn-kelly-the-first-casualty-in-donald-trumps-asymmetric-war-on-fox-news/

Och nu har hon glömt allt:
Megyn Kelly addresses Donald Trump's remarks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqcBA_BYJJw

Boehner avgår.

Kan detta har något med Trump att göra? Vill de korrumperade establishment republikanerna lämna skeppet i god tid, och av egen fri vilja?

Boehner har nog snarare tröttnat på extremisterna som sitter i kongressen för republikanerna. Det pågår åter debatt om att stänga ned USA:s förvaltning och Boehner har försökt få tillstånd någon sorts kompromiss med demokraterna vilket Teapartygänget motsätter sig.

Fast jag tror det snarare är du som mins dåligt då hela bråket med Kelly hade redan lagt sig innan det senaste tjafset som ledde till att hela Fox News bad honom snällt att sluta att ge sig på henne.

Oavsett om du tycker att han uppför sig som en vuxen människa eller inte spelar ingen roll då att han faktiskt är villig att prata med Fox News så snabbt igen bevisar att det var dumt av honom att indirekt göra sig av med dem då de kan sätta stopp för potentiella kandidater inom GoP.

Sista droppen var nog när det demokratiska partiet valde att inte leka på republikanernas villkor nu, så vi lär nog förhoppningsvis se början av en vårstädning inom partiet eller i värsta fall så ser vi hur Donald Trump men även de som är värre än honom är partiets dödsryckning.

Han har uppenbarligen varit trött på skiten ett bra tag. Ur GOPs sjuka syn på hur staten ska fungera( eller icke fungera ala Ted Cruz) så har en gjort det han ska göra.

Kanske för tidigt att säga än men ser vi ett trendbrott? http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-national-gop-primary

Ett väldigt intressant försök, sammantaget så menas att han inte lyckats entusiasmera väljarna, det är säkert sant. Men om man skulle gå djupare in på varför det inte lyckats så vore det intressant att få veta väljarnas egen verbalisering av anledningarna till misslyckandet att entusiasmera dem. Men jag kanske krånglar till någonting enkelt, kanske är det helt enkelt brist på mediatid och för låg name recognition.

Trump verkar ju i alla fall inte vara särskilt imponerad av Boehner.
Donald Trump on Speaker Boehner resignation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDxO-KBfvXw

Speaker Boehners avgång var ju väldigt oväntad. Någon slags religös kris efter att ha träffat Påven? Varför gråter han så?
John Boehner crying like a Baby with Pope Francis the video that brought him down.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHgPB-3xewE