Andrew Anglin om Ukraina:
Citat:
...
We are supposed to believe that it is okay for a few thousand radical terrorists to overthrow a democratically elected government using firebombs, lead piping, baseball bats, handguns and homemade catapults, because they didn’t like a treaty decision the President made? And that if they don’t succeed, the US government has a moral duty to support their endeavor? That is really the explanation being given to the public as to why Obama feels it is his duty to meddle in the affairs of a former Soviet state with virtually no ties to the US?
It truly feels like they are not trying, like they do not even care how they appear.
...
This part is even more twisted. After Putin ordered military drills when Kiev fell, Obama gave the now infamous, threatening speech, where he told the Russian people that “there will be consequences” if they try to defend their brothers and sisters against the violent revolutionary Kiev government installed through terrorism.
What is being implied here? What is he even talking about? What are you supposed to take away from that? Again, just that the terrorists are the good guys, and the fire-bomb revolution was “democracy”?
...
The symbolic victory of either side is perhaps more important than the economic ramifications, as this ultimately amounts to a battle for hearts and minds. Just as the West is trying to corrupt the minds of the people in Russia with Pussy Riot and other such projects, Putin has been appealing to the conservative elements in our society – in a much less invasive and violating manner – by preaching and demonstrating traditional values.
Neither side is willing to lose, but there might be a way that both sides could claim victory. Though this is difficult, as Putin is not going to budge on Crimea, and if the people ask it of him, he is going to take a large portion of Eastern Ukraine as well. From where I am sitting, it does not appear if he has any interest in rolling into Kiev though, so perhaps, if the Jews are allowed to keep the Western half of the country, they will be willing to call it a day.
It comes down to how far the Jews want to push this, and part of that is going to be based on how the masses respond to it. With Syria, someone somewhere pulling Obama’s strings recognized that if they pushed all the way into war, this entire facade would come crashing down, and the people would see the beast for what it is. At least, there was enough of a risk of that happening that they backed off, what with all of the mainstream publications openly stating that the driving force behind the push for war was the Israel Lobby. Here, it is much harder to see the fact that the Jews are wholly responsible for the situation, so they probably think they can put it all on Obama and his “international community” of Muppets, and later when it is obvious that it is an endless massacre, they can just claim he was deranged and insane – a loose cannon who started an intense and bloody international conflict because of personal problems. Just like they blame all the last decade’s horrors on Bush and Cheney, who were only butt0n-pushers of the neoconservative Jews.
...
Everything has come to a head. The Western family is dead, the homosexuals are forcing themselves on our children, the economy has collapsed and the savage hordes are inside the gates and they are ripping us apart. We have been divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother.
This is the last stand of European civilization. We face complete redemption or total annihilation.
The Ukraine is now Ground Zero, where darkness and light have met.
My prayers are with Tsar Vladimir Putin. I believe he has come to realize that he as an individual is currently the best hope for human civilization. He will either rise, and become who God intends that he becomes, or he won’t, and someone else will.
http://www.dailystormer.com/obamas-jihad-against-russia-drags-america-into-new-depths-of-shame/