Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
faceman
vilka bevis finns på att det va rebellerna som använde kemiska vapen?
jag har sätt videos där Fsa står och poserar med kemiska vapen och hotar med att använda dom.
och all logik pekar mot terroristerna. men hade varit trevligt att veta lite mer fakta.
kan någon sammanfatta en lisa som man kan undersöka ?
Det enda konkreta argumentet för att det var Assads regering är väl att det är endast dem som officiellt har militär utrustning med den kapaciteten. Att det talar för rebellerna är att de har mer att vinna på det då Assad borde ha låtit bli eftersom han blev varnad av Obama och att FB-inspektörerna anlände i samband med gasattacken, det påstås även av vissa källor i tråden att Assad förlorat flera soldater i attacken. Jag hittade en artikel om ämnet med bra argument:
Citat:
Recent news of a chemical weapons attack in Syria smacks of desperation. The question comes down to who is most desperate right now, the Assad regime or the Muslim Brotherhood rebels? Consider that since June, Assad’s forces have been winning. According to a CBS News report from last month, victories for the rebels had become “increasingly rare” and that the Muslim Brotherhood-backed opposition fighters were sustaining “some of their heaviest losses” near Damascus.
The New York Times echoed this sentiment, even saying that before gaining the upper hand, concerns were that Assad would use chemical weapons; he did not.
In fact, even before Assad’s forces gained the momentum, a UN official reportedly found evidence of rebels using chemical weapons but no evidence Assad’s regime did. This, from a Washington Times article by Shaun Waterman dated May 6, 2013:
Today, while the rebels are more desperate than they were at the time of that article, evidence of rebels using chemical weapons is available; evidence Assad’s regime has used them is not.
That doesn’t square with a video uploaded on August 23, 2013, in which Free Syrian operatives threatened to launch chemical weapons:
A day later, on August 24th, a video was uploaded and featured on facebook that purports to show Syrian rebels loading what very well may be a rocket armed with some sort of chemical agent. The tip of the rocket is armed with a light blue tank or canister that very well contains a nerve agent. At the end of this video, two separate launches of these rockets can be seen:
It’s significant to consider that the rebels were reportedly using chemical weapons at a time when Assad was more desperate than he is now. Again, why would Assad use chemical weapons now and not then? Who is more desperate at this point in the conflict?
Running concurrent with the tide that turned in Assad’s favor a few months ago was another defeat for the Muslim Brotherhood – in Egypt. That defeat has been taking place ever since Mohammed Mursi was ousted on July 3rd. So why would Assad use chemical weapons now and not months ago, when his situation was much more precarious?
http://shoebat.com/2013/08/27/evidence-syrian-rebels-used-chemical-weapons-not-assad/
En annan teori är att det pågår ett förräderi mot Assad i hans egna led och dessa ligger bakom attacken, var det inte någon högt uppsatt politiker som hoppade av alldeles nyss eller är jag helt ute och cyklar?
