Här har vi en skriver om Lockerbie. Inte helt oväntat.
http://www.starkibris.net/international/index.asp?haberID=11422
Citat:
Take as an example the Lockerbie mass murder in December, 1988. 270 people died. Despite a conviction that was later followed by the release from a Scottish prison of the Libyan who had been named as the main culprit, the case does not appear to be properly solved.
In 2003 the BBC World Service broadcast a long studio discussion on the Lockerbie enigma. Only seconds before the end of the programme, Oliver Miles, a former British ambassador to Libya, said that important facts about the mass murder remained unknown to the public.
As far as I know, no newspaper in the UK or elsewhere asked for these facts to be presented, by Mr Miles, or anyone who had knowledge of them.
What is it then about Lockerbie that makes mainstream journalists feel that they should not even ask questions?
Most of the 259 PanAm passengers and crew who died in the Lockerbie disaster were not celebrities. Possibly only one of them was given a full page obituary in The Times. He was Bernt Carlsson, formerly London-based Secretary General of Socialist International and, now, when he died, nothing less than Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations.
It is no secret that Carlsson was one of the victims, but it has appeared that attempts have been made to make you forget about him and his connection to Lockerbie.
Only days before the explosion over Lockerbie in Scotland, Bernt Carlsson asked six friends of his, including his girlfriend, a postgraduate university teacher, to come and meet him at a restaurant in Manhattan, New York City, where he lived and worked. They came, they all met.
Bernt said to his friends that he knew that he was soon going to be killed. He said he knew why and by whom Olof Palme, the Swedish Prime Minister, had been assassinated in 1986. The Palme murder case was so sensitive, that if you knew why and by whom he had been killed, you would not dare to admit to any authority that you had any knowledge of it.
Bernt had therefore never revealed to anyone what he knew, and he had kept his notes about the case locked up in his safe in his Manhattan apartment.
But now, he said to his friends, someone had broken into his flat and into his safe and had stolen his notes and left cash and valuables behind. That meant, he explained, that the ones who were responsible for the murder of Palme now knew what he knew. Hence, he went on, “I am going to be killed within days, but I do not know how.” With tears streaming down his cheeks, he said: “We will never meet again.”
They never met again. He died within days in the Lockerbie mass murder. Several governments have agreed to hush up facts about his last meeting with his friends.
Vem är då denne Bertil Wedin eller "Bertiel Verdin" som han kallas av Craig Williamson också utpekad i Lockerbieattentatet.
http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/special/media/media03.htm
Citat:
[FONT=Times New Roman]MR WILLIAMSON[/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman]: Yes, Mr Chairman, I have in fact given you documentation on Mr Bertiel Verdin, a Swedish journalist and in his case, he was in fact one of those journalists introduced to us as part of a Foreign Affairs programme.[/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman] He came to South Africa to cover you know, for some journalistic reason and who was then recruited for other purposes. If I can just refer to that document.[/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman] Sorry, which number is it? Yes, I have a memorandum. This was actually while I was still in the SAP, where I wrote to Colonel Goosen, who later became Brigadier Goosen. You can see on the top it was referred then to General Coetzee, saying the foreign journalist Bertiel Verdin, for whom you had made arrangements will visit South West Africa, Namibia, left the country on Sunday. He was particularly impressed with the positive and rendered a positive report to Mrs Thatcher and Mr Reagan's Foreign Affairs staff.[/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman] And he also undertook to work with Mr Brian Crosio to investigate which South African exiles in Britain were also trained terrorists.[/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman] And in his case, as has been well documented, his relationship became a close relationship with the Security Branch. He was paid for the information which he provided and in his case, interestingly enough, when he was charged in Britain, for the role he played, in receiving documentation stolen from the ANC and the PAC offices, he was in fact acquitted because as a journalist he had the legal right to do what we were paying him to do. It was not a crime for him to do what we wanted him to do.[/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman] This was one of the reasons why these type of people were used, because he not only had the access, but in fact it was not illegal for him to do something that would have been illegal for a South African Police Officer or Intelligence Officer.[/FONT]
