Direkt överförbart på Sverige?
Är det smart att öka invandring utan positiva ekonomiska effekter?
Inga bevis att nettoinvandring genererar betydande fördelar
Högre löner istället för invandring bättre men impopulärt hos arbetsgivare
Lägre bostadskostnader utan invandring
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/apr/01/immigrationpolicy.immigrationandpublicservices?gus rc=rss&feed=politics
Och skulle Billström våga säga detta med sina nya ideer om att asylsökare skall bli arbetskraftsinvandrare….
Vi insisterar på att arbeten erjuds egna medborgare först
Invandring gynnar invandrare och arbetsgivare men missgynnar lokalanställda
Lägg rapporten på minnet-den lär inte tas upp av PK politiker och PK media
.
Är det smart att öka invandring utan positiva ekonomiska effekter?
Citat:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/01/europe/london.php
"Looking to the future, if you have got that increase in numbers and you haven't got any economic benefit from it, you have got to ask yourself is this a wise thing to do?" said the committee chairman, John Wakeham.
Inga bevis att nettoinvandring genererar betydande fördelar
Citat:
Meningslös beräkning av påverkan på BNP
We found no evidence that net immigration (immigration minus emigration) generates significant economic benefits for the existing UK population.
Citat:
The government told the inquiry that migrants contributed £6bn to Britain's GDP in 2006. Sounds great, but it's completely meaningless. Smith will no doubt have taught her economics students that the key measure of a country's standard of living is GDP per head, not total GDP. In percentage terms, immigration has increased Britain's population almost in step with the impact on GDP. So the effect on GDP per head has been roughly zero.
Högre löner istället för invandring bättre men impopulärt hos arbetsgivare
Citat:
Surely immigration is needed for jobs Britons refuse to do, the government argues. But they refuse to do these jobs only at current pay rates. In many cases, higher wages - never popular with employers - could solve the "shortage". ....But in the longer run, when wages can be increased and production methods changed, there is no valid argument for continued high net immigration.
Lägre bostadskostnader utan invandring
Citat:
It is projected that if net immigration were zero, house prices would be 10% lower in 20 years' time - an important issue for those struggling to get on the property ladder.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/apr/01/immigrationpolicy.immigrationandpublicservices?gus rc=rss&feed=politics
Och skulle Billström våga säga detta med sina nya ideer om att asylsökare skall bli arbetskraftsinvandrare….
Vi insisterar på att arbeten erjuds egna medborgare först
Citat:
“We are going to be insisting that actually, you have got to offer a job to a British person first if you want to employ a skilled worker, and it is only if you can't find a British worker that you should be allowed to offer the job to somebody from outside,” Mr. Byrne said.
Invandring gynnar invandrare och arbetsgivare men missgynnar lokalanställda
Citat:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080401.wukimmigration0401/BNStory/International/home
The committee said the system benefits immigrants and their employers. But it says it likely hurts those in low-paid jobs and those who compete with the new immigrant workers.
Lägg rapporten på minnet-den lär inte tas upp av PK politiker och PK media
.
__________________
Senast redigerad av Spengler 2008-04-02 kl. 18:40.
Senast redigerad av Spengler 2008-04-02 kl. 18:40.
