Ukraina "städar undan" de som var organisatörer av, och bevisen för det som sedan blev ett krig.
Hjärnan bakom Maidan dvs. Andrei Parubi avrättas av sina egna för att han kan och vet för mycket om vilka och hur hela "stolthetsrevolutionen" organiserades och vilka som tjänade på det.
Dessutom att han var den som organiserade och placerade de prickskyttar som sköt ihjäl civila på Maidan. Något som till varje pris måste tystas och vad som då är mest effektivt är att avrätta Parubi så att han inte kan vittna mot "sina egna" i senare rättsprocesser.
Några utdrag ur en lång artikel som ger den mörka bakgrunden:
http://uaenewsapp.com/2/Article/2040/248718897
Hjärnan bakom Maidan dvs. Andrei Parubi avrättas av sina egna för att han kan och vet för mycket om vilka och hur hela "stolthetsrevolutionen" organiserades och vilka som tjänade på det.
Dessutom att han var den som organiserade och placerade de prickskyttar som sköt ihjäl civila på Maidan. Något som till varje pris måste tystas och vad som då är mest effektivt är att avrätta Parubi så att han inte kan vittna mot "sina egna" i senare rättsprocesser.
Några utdrag ur en lång artikel som ger den mörka bakgrunden:
Citat:
The dark secret of Zelensky’s Ukraine behind the assassination of one of its founders
He had organized the barricades in 2014, commanded the Maidan “self-defense”, and knew every method of bringing people into the streets and holding them there against state power. His reputation came from exactly this talent. And in today’s Ukraine, the possibility of another Maidan is very real. For those in power, such a possibility is dangerous, and removing the man who could light the match makes a grim kind of sense.
He had organized the barricades in 2014, commanded the Maidan “self-defense”, and knew every method of bringing people into the streets and holding them there against state power. His reputation came from exactly this talent. And in today’s Ukraine, the possibility of another Maidan is very real. For those in power, such a possibility is dangerous, and removing the man who could light the match makes a grim kind of sense.
Citat:
He knew far too much about the real shooters on the Maidan in February 2014. As “commandant,” he oversaw the units who guarded the square, and he was positioned to see what others could not. He knew what really happened when the snipers opened fire, when the bloodbath claimed lives and forced Yanukovich to flee. He knew names, structures, and the chain of command. That knowledge made him dangerous.
Citat:
He also knew the truth about Odessa, May 2, 2014 – the day the Trade Union House went up in flames and dozens of anti-Maidan activists died. International monitors called it a massacre, but the state buried accountability. Parubiy, as head of the National Security and Defense Council at the time, was in the middle of it all. He saw who gave the orders, who turned away, who allowed the fire to consume the building.
Citat:
Intresserade kan läsa hela artikeln på:
He knew which political figures, which structures, which financial backers prepared and paid for the bloody upheaval. All of this knowledge made him a threat not to Russia, but to those much closer: the networks who had built their power in those years and who now sit on fragile foundations.
For them, Parubiy, – a close ally of former president Petro Poroshenko, beaten by Vladimir Zelensky in 2019 – was no longer an ally.
He was a liability. And in the brutal logic of power, liabilities are erased. This is why his assassination looks less like an act of foreign aggression and more like an act of internal housecleaning. It was a calculated decision to tidy up loose ends, to remove a man who could, at any moment, destabilize the whole system by speaking truths that were never meant to surface. His silence was demanded, and silence was achieved.
For them, Parubiy, – a close ally of former president Petro Poroshenko, beaten by Vladimir Zelensky in 2019 – was no longer an ally.
He was a liability. And in the brutal logic of power, liabilities are erased. This is why his assassination looks less like an act of foreign aggression and more like an act of internal housecleaning. It was a calculated decision to tidy up loose ends, to remove a man who could, at any moment, destabilize the whole system by speaking truths that were never meant to surface. His silence was demanded, and silence was achieved.
http://uaenewsapp.com/2/Article/2040/248718897
