f.d general Zaluzny uttalar sig i Ukrainska Pravda
(hade han postat motsvarande på Fb hade han blivit kallad för "vatnik")
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2026/08/03/8047090/
"Zaluzhnyi argued that one obstacle to Ukraine's NATO accession is that "it is impossible to join an organisation that is guided by World War II doctrines in light of the current capabilities of the Ukrainian Armed Forces". (läs: Nato är för ålderdomligt för ukrainska armén)
The ambassador was also highly critical of NATO's overall capabilities, despite countries such as the UK and the US being members.
"Most likely, NATO will remain in its current form and will spend another 12 years, just as Ukraine did, transitioning to the standards required to reach even half of the Russian Federation's level," he said. (Nato har för dålig produktionskapacitet för att kunna matcha Ryssland)
"Regarding future security guarantees for Ukraine, he argued that
other alliances than NATO could prove more effective: "Ukraine will align itself with blocs and alliances that are likely to emerge. Most probably, this will be a European military security bloc."
Slutsats NATO är inget att ha för Ukraina. Däremot kanske andra typer av allianser inom Europa.
Det stämmer bra överens med mina egna slutsatser ang Nato - den döende svanen.