Hallå alla glada själar. Jag såg precis en intervju med Whitney Webb där hon väldigt detaljerat förklarar en plan för hur bankerna kommer krascha innan 2025 och att detta kommer vara steget in till CBDC (e-krona). Denna e-kronan kommer vara bunden till ett digitalt id som spårar allt du gör i realtid både ekonomiskt och alla aktiviteter online.
Först och främst ville jag bara starta denna tråd för att se vad som faktiskt händer vid slutet av 2024.
Men självklart också, vad ska man göra med sina pengar om man tror att bankerna kommer krascha?
Om internet stängs ner och övervakas så borde inte Bitcoin hjälpa något heller.
Vad är era tankar
https://youtu.be/BlfZ91Pot-w
Först och främst ville jag bara starta denna tråd för att se vad som faktiskt händer vid slutet av 2024.
Men självklart också, vad ska man göra med sina pengar om man tror att bankerna kommer krascha?
Om internet stängs ner och övervakas så borde inte Bitcoin hjälpa något heller.
Vad är era tankar
https://youtu.be/BlfZ91Pot-w
As Whitney explains in her interview above, it is likely that in the next year there will be a false flag cyberattack on the banks similar to 9/11. They will then use this attack to shut down the internet and implement a draconian Cyber Patriot Act.
Webb segues into the next action item in the globalist takeover, which appears to include a cyberattack on the banks sometime before the end of next year.
"There’s a public-private partnership [The Partnership Against Cybercrime] housed within the World Economic Forum (WEF) [and] the groups that compose this partnership are the FBI, the DOJ, the Secret Service, one of Israel’s security agencies, the UK National Crime Agency, a bunch of banks and a few tech companies ... Palantir, PayPal, Microsoft.
They’re led by a former Israeli spy named Tal Goldstein ... Jeremy Jurgens, who is No. 2 at the WEF after Claus Schwab, at the big WEF meeting earlier this year was like ‘Yep, [there will be a] big, giant cyberattack before 2025.’
The Partnership Against Cybercrime — that’s the DOJ and all of these guys — say that it's going to be a cyberattack on the banks. Isn't that convenient? The banks can just be like, ‘We've collapsed, but but it wasn't our fault. It was the fault of these nasty hackers.’ And I'm sure the hackers will be Hamas and Iran.
They can blame anyone, because as we know from Vault 7 and Wikileaks that the CIA has the ability to frame literally any government it wants, or any group it wants, for a cyberattack, and the CIA lost control of those tools — hence Wikileaks obtaining them and publishing them — so anyone can do it [and] anyone can blame anyone, so it's very difficult to attribute.
Even if you look at headlines about cyberattacks that have happened over the past several years, it's usually a cybersecurity company that, if you look on its website, was created by In-Q-Tel (the CIA) or by Israel's unit 8200, which is Israel's NSA equivalent, and they're saying stuff like ‘High probability that it might have been these guys and our proof is that we don't have any proof, but it looks like something we think they did before.’
I mean, there's no evidence for anything but out of that gobledygook you get a headline that says ‘Chinese hackers responsible,’ or ‘Iranian hackers responsible,’ and that's all people see and read."
As noted by Bent:
"It’s very easy to see that we could be in Chapter 1 of a systemic bank failure. It starts with this conflict in the Middle East, it keeps rising and then there's an excuse to begin cyberattacking perceived enemies and that's how the banks get attacked."
According to Webb, a group of big banks affiliated with the WEF called the FS-ISAC (the Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center) has been gaming this out since 2021.
"They collaborated with the European Central Bank, the FED [Federal Reserve], and the Carnegie Endowment, which at the time was run by the current CIA director William Burns, talking about exactly how the cyberattack on the banks was going to play out."
CBDCs by Any Other Name Are Still CBDCs
Once the banks have been taken down in a major cyberattack, the central banks will then "save the day" by introducing a programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC) where every transaction can be traced. In areas where public awareness about the risks of CBDCs is too great, such as the U.S., they may try to keep the two-tier system as it exists under the current Fed Now system. As explained by Webb:
"The CBDCs exist, but the public doesn't necessarily interact with it, which is essentially what FED Now is going to be. It’s about settlements between banks. They’ll use the CBDC. The public will interact instead with deposit tokens that'll be issued by the commercial banks. They're not called CBDCs but they're programmable money, and they're going to run on the rails of FED Now."
All the big banks have signed on to the concept of deposit tokens and tokenized assets — and the control system that comes with it. The head of JP Morgan Chase, Jamie Diamond, recently suggested that private property should be seized for the purpose of combating climate change, and that’s precisely what they’ll be able to do with tokenized assets. "So, it doesn’t have to be a CBDC to have the same consequences," Webb says.
The End of Online Anonymity
The second thing that will happen once the cyberattack on the banks has occurred is the elimination of online anonymity.
Everyone must choose between freedom and enslavement, and the option to choose freedom is rapidly closing.
The principles of "know your customer" (KYC) will be imposed on everybody for everything, and anything that doesn't have that will be made illegal under National Security justifications. Essentially, what we’re looking at is a cyber Patriot Act, which will allow for the unfettered surveillance of everyone’s online activities, and the ability to restrict or block access to the internet.
"Of course, the end of online anonymity means tying a government issued [digital] ID to your internet access ... at the ISP level, and that's what they've mapped out. The internet as you know it will not exist after this happens," Webb says.
"The goal is no anonymity, period, and to have everything you do surveilled and compiled, and to have AI oversee it all and do this predictive policing, pre-crime stuff based on what you've already done, and what you will do.
So, the most important thing to do is not to participate in the system after that event. Just don't do it.
I would say, if you want some of the stuff that's on the internet now, in terms of knowledge, back that up offline. Download it. Put it on hard drives. Faraday bag it. Keep it safe, because if you might want that stuff after all this happens, and you don't want to have to get the cattle tag to be able to be online, definitely think ahead.
Because if you want to believe what the WEF says about this timeline — and I would take them seriously — you've got a year, give or take a few months, before the internet gets nuked."
Webb segues into the next action item in the globalist takeover, which appears to include a cyberattack on the banks sometime before the end of next year.
"There’s a public-private partnership [The Partnership Against Cybercrime] housed within the World Economic Forum (WEF) [and] the groups that compose this partnership are the FBI, the DOJ, the Secret Service, one of Israel’s security agencies, the UK National Crime Agency, a bunch of banks and a few tech companies ... Palantir, PayPal, Microsoft.
They’re led by a former Israeli spy named Tal Goldstein ... Jeremy Jurgens, who is No. 2 at the WEF after Claus Schwab, at the big WEF meeting earlier this year was like ‘Yep, [there will be a] big, giant cyberattack before 2025.’
The Partnership Against Cybercrime — that’s the DOJ and all of these guys — say that it's going to be a cyberattack on the banks. Isn't that convenient? The banks can just be like, ‘We've collapsed, but but it wasn't our fault. It was the fault of these nasty hackers.’ And I'm sure the hackers will be Hamas and Iran.
They can blame anyone, because as we know from Vault 7 and Wikileaks that the CIA has the ability to frame literally any government it wants, or any group it wants, for a cyberattack, and the CIA lost control of those tools — hence Wikileaks obtaining them and publishing them — so anyone can do it [and] anyone can blame anyone, so it's very difficult to attribute.
Even if you look at headlines about cyberattacks that have happened over the past several years, it's usually a cybersecurity company that, if you look on its website, was created by In-Q-Tel (the CIA) or by Israel's unit 8200, which is Israel's NSA equivalent, and they're saying stuff like ‘High probability that it might have been these guys and our proof is that we don't have any proof, but it looks like something we think they did before.’
I mean, there's no evidence for anything but out of that gobledygook you get a headline that says ‘Chinese hackers responsible,’ or ‘Iranian hackers responsible,’ and that's all people see and read."
As noted by Bent:
"It’s very easy to see that we could be in Chapter 1 of a systemic bank failure. It starts with this conflict in the Middle East, it keeps rising and then there's an excuse to begin cyberattacking perceived enemies and that's how the banks get attacked."
According to Webb, a group of big banks affiliated with the WEF called the FS-ISAC (the Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center) has been gaming this out since 2021.
"They collaborated with the European Central Bank, the FED [Federal Reserve], and the Carnegie Endowment, which at the time was run by the current CIA director William Burns, talking about exactly how the cyberattack on the banks was going to play out."
CBDCs by Any Other Name Are Still CBDCs
Once the banks have been taken down in a major cyberattack, the central banks will then "save the day" by introducing a programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC) where every transaction can be traced. In areas where public awareness about the risks of CBDCs is too great, such as the U.S., they may try to keep the two-tier system as it exists under the current Fed Now system. As explained by Webb:
"The CBDCs exist, but the public doesn't necessarily interact with it, which is essentially what FED Now is going to be. It’s about settlements between banks. They’ll use the CBDC. The public will interact instead with deposit tokens that'll be issued by the commercial banks. They're not called CBDCs but they're programmable money, and they're going to run on the rails of FED Now."
All the big banks have signed on to the concept of deposit tokens and tokenized assets — and the control system that comes with it. The head of JP Morgan Chase, Jamie Diamond, recently suggested that private property should be seized for the purpose of combating climate change, and that’s precisely what they’ll be able to do with tokenized assets. "So, it doesn’t have to be a CBDC to have the same consequences," Webb says.
The End of Online Anonymity
The second thing that will happen once the cyberattack on the banks has occurred is the elimination of online anonymity.
Everyone must choose between freedom and enslavement, and the option to choose freedom is rapidly closing.
The principles of "know your customer" (KYC) will be imposed on everybody for everything, and anything that doesn't have that will be made illegal under National Security justifications. Essentially, what we’re looking at is a cyber Patriot Act, which will allow for the unfettered surveillance of everyone’s online activities, and the ability to restrict or block access to the internet.
"Of course, the end of online anonymity means tying a government issued [digital] ID to your internet access ... at the ISP level, and that's what they've mapped out. The internet as you know it will not exist after this happens," Webb says.
"The goal is no anonymity, period, and to have everything you do surveilled and compiled, and to have AI oversee it all and do this predictive policing, pre-crime stuff based on what you've already done, and what you will do.
So, the most important thing to do is not to participate in the system after that event. Just don't do it.
I would say, if you want some of the stuff that's on the internet now, in terms of knowledge, back that up offline. Download it. Put it on hard drives. Faraday bag it. Keep it safe, because if you might want that stuff after all this happens, and you don't want to have to get the cattle tag to be able to be online, definitely think ahead.
Because if you want to believe what the WEF says about this timeline — and I would take them seriously — you've got a year, give or take a few months, before the internet gets nuked."
