Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
qwerty-66
Kollade på platz.se och positivity rate ökar samtidigt som antalet fall ökar. Så R måste ju vara över 1.
Dock var FHMs siffra från september 24 men redan då ser ju R ut att vara över 1 enligt Platz.se.
Kanske är "Brittonkalkyl" som kommit fram till 0.89?
( Brittonkalkyl är när man först bestämmer resultatet enl sin agenda för att sen anpassa kalkylen så "rätt" resultat redovisas)
Possibly. I think there’s so much data out there that everybody is somewhat guilty of these “Britton calculations”. But Tegnell looks to be wrong in his estimation, judging by the now somewhat exponential growth we are seeing.
But I’ve said this would happen and put a date on it. So did Tegnell and the FHM. I don’t understand why they are now going against what they’ve argued for (a second wave beginning in September) after they’ve previously warned for it and possibly are being proven correct. That organization changes agenda like a whore changes partners.
The R0 by all estimations of the data available is above 1. I think it will continue to rise above 2 throughout this month and is somewhere around 1.5 currently. I have no idea how Tegnell can calculate 0.89 even if it is based off of critical cases, because those appear to be rising too.
I imagine if this is a true second wave we’ll peak around January, slowly drop off through to April and then it will be time for the pandemic to switch hemispheres. Time will, as always, tell.