Den där Mukasey är väldigt sansad. Jag rekommenderar våra konspirationsteoretiker att lyssna på honom.
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/ex-ag-mukasey-no-special-prosecutor-theres-nothing-prosecute
Citat:
The only crime that I have heard about or seen of that was committed was committed by the Russians when they hacked the DNC. They hacked John Podesta, and they tried to hack the Republican National Committee. That's the only crime that I'm aware of.
Now, the question is, of course, is why was it committed? Some people say it was committed to promote the election of Donald Trump. I happen to think that is ridiculous. Because at the time that it had happened, Donald Trump looked like a sure loser. And you'd have to believe that Vladimir Putin was an idiot trying to back a sure loser.
I think much more likely he was trying to intimidate a sure winner, Secretary Clinton.
Haha, sure loser/winner. Men han har ju rätt.
Och här är hans en vecka gamla intervju i CNN
https://youtu.be/cuyXvapyMfs?t=8m50s
Citat:
“Should he recuse himself and get a special prosecutor?” she asked.
“No!” Mukasey said. “Special prosecutor of what? Where’s the crime? We haven’t even named the crime, let alone suggested that charges are going to be brought.”
Mukasey swatted down Burnett’s apparent hope that any proof of conversations would be “a criminal act.”
“No, it wouldn’t,” he said.
“Even if they had regular contact talking about working together?” Burnett asked.
“The only statute I know that that conceivably violates is the Logan Act and that hasn’t been prosecuted since 1793,” he said.
“But I’m talking about collusion or ‘it would be great if you could find things on Hillary Clinton,’ those sorts of conversations,” Burnett said. “That would be treason, right?”
“What?” Mukasey said, astonished.
“No?” she said.
“No!” Mukasey said.
Burnett then subtly shifted to ask him if he was “fine with it” — moving from his interpretation of the law to his opinion.
“It’s not a question of being fine with it because I’m not fine with it. There’s a difference between treason and what I’m fine with or not. And saying you ought to get stuff on Hillary Clinton, believe it or not, is not a crime, even if you’re saying it to the Russians.”
Det var extra roligt när han säger
whaaaat?! när CNN frågar om landsförräderi
Han håller med mig på nästan alla punkter:
1 FBI avlyssnade sannolikt Trump/hans krets (detta baserar han på nyheterna, precis som jag)
2 Det är löjligt att tro att Ryssland samarbetade med Trump. Det är klart att de ville underminera Hillary.
3 Att FBI "undersöker" Trump är helt normalt, det är inte någon brottsutredning (som media vill framställa det som).
4 Inget fel med att prata med Ryssland. Det är inte ens olagligt att samarbeta med dem och att be dem att "get stuff on Hillary Clinton"
5 Att Priebus bad Comey att dementera NY Times fake news "is a totally natural reaction".
Somliga konspirationsteoretiker borde sansa sig
//////////////////
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/andrew-giuliani-hired-trump-white-house-235718
Citat:
President Donald Trump has brought on Andrew Giuliani, the son of former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, to work in the Office of Public Liaison and Intergovernmental Affairs, two sources familiar with the hire told POLITICO
Drain the Swamp