Stora tråden om Donald Trump [mod]

"Second, Donald J. Trump is not only unqualified for the job, but he may well pose a threat to our national security," he continued, noting his work with Clinton in her capacity of secretary of state and her resolute advocacy of the raid that led to the killing of Osama bin Laden in 2011.
Trump "has no experience on national security," Morell wrote.
"Even more important, the character traits he has exhibited during the primary season suggest he would be a poor, even dangerous, commander in chief," Morell said, naming Trump's "obvious need for self-aggrandizement, his overreaction to perceived slights, his tendency to make decisions based on intuition, his refusal to change his views based on new information, his routine carelessness with the facts, his unwillingness to listen to others and his lack of respect for the rule of law. The dangers that flow from Mr. Trump’s character are not just risks that would emerge if he became president. It is already damaging our national security."

Regulus skrev

Ja, hon ljuger "smidigare" än Trump därför att hennes syfte är att lura folk, inte som Trump att chockera och få uppmärksamhet.

Om du lusläser det Clinton sagt finner du ofta att hon sagt något helt annat än folk tror att hon sagt. Så inte med Trump. Han talar som glimmande skrev alltid klarspråk, på gott och ont.

Iranstoryn är ett exempel på detta. Det har varit känt i flera månader att USA betalade tillbaka 400 miljoner dollar i "frysta" pengar för vapen som Iran aldrig fick, som en del av avtalet med Iran. Inget konstigt med det, och ingen muta, utan alltså iranska pengar som betalades tillbaka.