Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Rektangel
Nationalsocialismen verkar vara en paraplyideologi som går att förena med alla de andra större ideologierna som enar monarkister, nationalister, socialister etc.
Syftet är mycket riktigt att ena alla samhällsklasser i en nation och blir då motpolen till internationalism eller kosmopolitiskt tankegods. Även om Hitlers väpnade styrkor i viss mån utvecklades till en alleuropeisk armé.
Ungefär som skillnaden mellan stalinism och trotskism och i viss mån har stalinismen vissa likheter med Hitlers idéer. De kunde ju samarbeta rent pragmatiskt.
Marknadsliberal ekonomiskt tänkande som bejakar att odugliga företag går under i konkurs och att livskraftiga överlever blir då i ett annat perspektiv inget annat än socialdarwinism i Hitlers skepnad.
you can spot the masonic elements in national socialism by the creation of the ubermensch, or the "new man", the fabian socialists that now run the show have the same idea. The difference between the national socialists and the fabian socialists is the national socialists idea of the "new man" is the aryan, while the fabian socialists want race mixing and globalism, which basically is just a continuation of the destruction of the countries we call the 3rd world trough colonization, by using a bit different methods in destroying the 1st world, the western world. We were the cherry on the cake to be eaten after they had used the western countries to plunder the rest of the planet.
it looks to me national socialism was created to be destroyed just like "red symphony" describe, so that they could push globalism and multiculture with the nazi's as the boogeyman and pull the hitler card if you disagree with the agenda. Without Hitler, theyre would be no united nations, no israel, no multuculture (we wouldnt have accepted this massive immigration we have now) etc. The fabian socialists / zionists basically got theyre way without opposition after Hitler.
Germany was seen as the heartland of the "white" countries, and when germany went down, the rest of the western world went down with it. Now we're soon to become 3rd world countries, poverty is exploding in the west, we've lost our heritage and culture, we've got a surveillance system we havent seen since the STASI-days in east germany all over the western world, handed over national soveregnity to global organizations like EU, UN, WTO, IMF etc so what party we elect soon is irrelevant because our local politicians dont have any say in important matters anymore and we've accepted micromanagement from politicians thats put in by these global organizations and doesnt give a damn about what we think. If we have the balls to elect a more nationalistic oriented party which becomes big enough to be a problem, they other controlled parties will simply ban it.
And people dont even have the brains to figure this out and keep voting for these assholes, because they sit and watch entertainment for idiots on TV. The second reason is even more simple; people are cowards. They cheer on the winning team because it takes some guts to go against the stream and join the side thats considered the weak and loosing side. We dont want to be viewed as unpopular and loosers, right?