2007-12-07, 00:20
#1
Trots min avatar så är jag ingen matematiker, astronom eller fysiker av sådan rang att jag ens begriper om det ligger något i vad som skrivs i nedanstående citat, men däremot så är jag övertygad om att det finns några här som åtm kan ge intelligenta gissningar.
Och skulle det vara rätt, så minskar det inte på något sätt det beundransvärda i Alberts insats. Alla teorier om universum ersätts av bättre, sådan är ju vetenskapen.
Först lite stödbevis för att det kan ligga något i det:
Enligt en australisk professor Cahill så slarvade Einstein lite i sin speciella relativitetsteori, och om nu Cahill har rätt, så är ljusets hastighet INTE någon övre gräns för hur snabbt något kan färdas.
http://www.rense.com/general68/einsteiniswrong.htm
Andra australiensare har också funnit tecken på att ljushastigheten inte ens är konstant, utan saktat ner med tiden:
http://www.wired.com/science/discove.../2002/08/54394
Sen finns det många tokstollar som också angriper relativitetsteorin, fysiken och vetenskapen, men de kanske vi kan lämna därhän:
http://www.crank.net/relativity.html
Men, den som jag blev mest konfunderad över är Steven Bryants genomgång av ett antal matematiska blundrar som han påstår att Einstein gjort.
http://www.relativitychallenge.com/index.htm
Han har ju lite fascinerande utsikter om vad som kan vara möjligt:
Är det någon som kan belysa om han har rätt?
Det låter ju bestickande, men det brukar förenklingar ofta göra.
Och skulle det vara rätt, så minskar det inte på något sätt det beundransvärda i Alberts insats. Alla teorier om universum ersätts av bättre, sådan är ju vetenskapen.
Först lite stödbevis för att det kan ligga något i det:
Enligt en australisk professor Cahill så slarvade Einstein lite i sin speciella relativitetsteori, och om nu Cahill har rätt, så är ljusets hastighet INTE någon övre gräns för hur snabbt något kan färdas.
http://www.rense.com/general68/einsteiniswrong.htm
Citat:
In 2002, Professor Cahill started to question what he thought were anomalies in Einstein's theory that time and space are relative.
"They all agreed with one another and they were all indicating a huge speed difference in different directions," he said. "When you find out the speed of light differs, the whole Einstein theory starts collapsing."
"We know now the speed of light at approximately 300,000km per second is relative to space itself - before it was always relative to the observer."
Professor Cahill said that debunking the Einstein theories would lead to new discoveries in physics and greater understanding of phenomena that could not yet be fully explained.
"There are some incredible discoveries being made," he said. "We're discovering some properties about space that are awesome."
Those discoveries include the speed at which the solar system is travelling through space and the detection of gravitational waves.
"The rotation of galaxies has always been a problem - we now understand how they work," Professor Cahill said.
"The outer part of spiral galaxies go around about 10 times faster than Einstein's theory permits, so people invented dark matter to account for extra gravitational pull.
"They've spent years and millions of dollars looking for it - but it doesn't exist."
"They all agreed with one another and they were all indicating a huge speed difference in different directions," he said. "When you find out the speed of light differs, the whole Einstein theory starts collapsing."
"We know now the speed of light at approximately 300,000km per second is relative to space itself - before it was always relative to the observer."
Professor Cahill said that debunking the Einstein theories would lead to new discoveries in physics and greater understanding of phenomena that could not yet be fully explained.
"There are some incredible discoveries being made," he said. "We're discovering some properties about space that are awesome."
Those discoveries include the speed at which the solar system is travelling through space and the detection of gravitational waves.
"The rotation of galaxies has always been a problem - we now understand how they work," Professor Cahill said.
"The outer part of spiral galaxies go around about 10 times faster than Einstein's theory permits, so people invented dark matter to account for extra gravitational pull.
"They've spent years and millions of dollars looking for it - but it doesn't exist."
Andra australiensare har också funnit tecken på att ljushastigheten inte ens är konstant, utan saktat ner med tiden:
http://www.wired.com/science/discove.../2002/08/54394
Sen finns det många tokstollar som också angriper relativitetsteorin, fysiken och vetenskapen, men de kanske vi kan lämna därhän:
http://www.crank.net/relativity.html
Men, den som jag blev mest konfunderad över är Steven Bryants genomgång av ett antal matematiska blundrar som han påstår att Einstein gjort.
http://www.relativitychallenge.com/index.htm
Citat:
Many scientist critical of Special Relativity have challenged Einstein's theory on the grounds of logical inconsistencies (e.g., challenges to the twin paradox or time dilation). While they offer compelling arguments, they have not found definitive evidence resulting in a crisis that the scientific community must respond to.
My challenge to the validity of Einstein's equations is based on mathematics, which greatly simplifies my argument. This foundation in mathematics establishes a set of rules that the scientific community already accepts. This approach has the advantage of being readily verifiable by the greater scientific community.
Here we review each of Einstein's derivations to identify and explain the mathematical mistake in each.
My challenge to the validity of Einstein's equations is based on mathematics, which greatly simplifies my argument. This foundation in mathematics establishes a set of rules that the scientific community already accepts. This approach has the advantage of being readily verifiable by the greater scientific community.
Here we review each of Einstein's derivations to identify and explain the mathematical mistake in each.
Han har ju lite fascinerande utsikter om vad som kan vara möjligt:
Citat:
We are now faced with an opportunity to revisit our understanding of modern physics. Things that have appeared as facts now have alternative meanings. Paradoxes that were required part of scientific theory can be removed using another conforming theory.
Here are a few examples:
In the model of Complete and Incomplete Coordinate Systems, there is no theoretical speed limit to how fast various phenomena and coordinate systems can travel.
This model predicts other phenomena and wave medium with velocities faster than the speed of light. This means we may soon identify a gravity and/or quantum wave medium that could be used to explain observations in both domains.
Mediums within Complete Coordinate Systems may have different behaviors for the speed of light. This might explain faster (or slower) than the speed of light experiments. These may be examples of Complete Coordinate Systems with respect to EMF.
Various mediums may exist simultaneously with each other. For example, in an airplane, sound waves may behave according to the rules of Complete Coordinate Systems with respect to the air, while light may behave according to the rules of Incomplete Coordinate Systems.
The future is exciting. The model of Complete and Incomplete Coordinate Systems can play a role in helping us develop a new understanding of space and time.
Here are a few examples:
In the model of Complete and Incomplete Coordinate Systems, there is no theoretical speed limit to how fast various phenomena and coordinate systems can travel.
This model predicts other phenomena and wave medium with velocities faster than the speed of light. This means we may soon identify a gravity and/or quantum wave medium that could be used to explain observations in both domains.
Mediums within Complete Coordinate Systems may have different behaviors for the speed of light. This might explain faster (or slower) than the speed of light experiments. These may be examples of Complete Coordinate Systems with respect to EMF.
Various mediums may exist simultaneously with each other. For example, in an airplane, sound waves may behave according to the rules of Complete Coordinate Systems with respect to the air, while light may behave according to the rules of Incomplete Coordinate Systems.
The future is exciting. The model of Complete and Incomplete Coordinate Systems can play a role in helping us develop a new understanding of space and time.
Är det någon som kan belysa om han har rätt?
Det låter ju bestickande, men det brukar förenklingar ofta göra.
