Hur ska man betrakta chicago-skolan då? Dom accepterar en centralbank och att staten därmed penningpolitiken (?)
Socialliberaler eller klassiska liberaler? Socialliberal känns som att ta i lite
En wikipedia-artikel beskriver:
Citat:
It is associated with neoclassical price theory and free market libertarianism, the refutation and rejection of Keynesianism in favor of monetarism (until the 1980s, when it turned to rational expectations), and the rejection of regulation of business in favor of laissez-faire.
Citat:
The Chicago school of economics is a school of thought favoring free-market economics practiced at and disseminated from the University of Chicago in the middle of the 20th century. The leaders were Nobel laureates George Stigler and Milton Friedman. Its attitudes towards economics are the intellectual heirs of the Austrian school of economics.
"Arvtagarna" påverkades uppenbarligen av Keynesianismen, men ses samtidigt som opponenter till det systemet?