Citat:
Det hela börjar kännas rätt så obehagligt. Antingen så har det brutit ut en masspsykos i Washington eller så ligger det något i den här historien.
Marik von Rennekampff, med egen bakgrund som analytiker på bl a försvarsdepartementet, på The Hill går igenom händelseförloppet och kommer med en del intressanta infallsvinklar.
Dels konfirmerar hans egna källor att ”the intelligence community inspector general found “allegations that there is a [UFO crash retrieval] program [to be] urgent and credible.””
Dels hävdar han att Grusch i ärendet ”is represented by a lawyer who served previously as the intelligence community’s first inspector general, a Senate-confirmed position.”
Vidare att ”numerous current and former officials confirmed the outlines of Grusch’s explosive allegations. The officials also provided context and descriptions of the vehicles allegedly recovered by the surreptitious UFO retrieval and reverse engineering effort.”
https://thehill.com/opinion/4038159-...edible-urgent/
Marik von Rennekampff, med egen bakgrund som analytiker på bl a försvarsdepartementet, på The Hill går igenom händelseförloppet och kommer med en del intressanta infallsvinklar.
Dels konfirmerar hans egna källor att ”the intelligence community inspector general found “allegations that there is a [UFO crash retrieval] program [to be] urgent and credible.””
Dels hävdar han att Grusch i ärendet ”is represented by a lawyer who served previously as the intelligence community’s first inspector general, a Senate-confirmed position.”
Vidare att ”numerous current and former officials confirmed the outlines of Grusch’s explosive allegations. The officials also provided context and descriptions of the vehicles allegedly recovered by the surreptitious UFO retrieval and reverse engineering effort.”
https://thehill.com/opinion/4038159-...edible-urgent/
Nu kan vi äntligen reda ut detta och vi hade fel båda två. ICIG ansåg att David Grusch uppgifter om att information undanhålls kongressen på ett felaktigt sätt var urgent and credible.
Citat:
Statement on Compass Rose Legal Group’s Successfully Concluded Representation of Former Client David Grusch
Washington, DC – Compass Rose Legal Group has successfully concluded its representation of former client David Grush on matters limited to his reasonable belief that elements of the Intelligence Community improperly withheld or concealed alleged classified information from the U.S. Congress. The firm filed a narrowly-scoped whistleblower disclosure with the Intelligence Community Inspector General (“ICIG”) and associated personnel matters – and had represented Mr. Grusch since February 2022.
Recent media articles misstate the scope of the firm’s representation, and include material misstatements of fact pertaining to our representation, which we have requested be corrected.
The whistleblower disclosure did not speak to the specifics of the alleged classified information that Mr. Grusch has now publicly characterized, and the substance of that information has always been outside of the scope of Compass Rose’s representation. Compass Rose took no position and takes no position on the contents of the withheld information.
The ICIG found Mr. Grusch’s assertion that information was inappropriately concealed from Congress to be urgent and credible in response to the filed disclosure. Compass Rose brought this matter to the ICIG’s attention through lawful channels and successfully defended Mr. Grusch against retaliation.
We wish our former client the very best in the next steps of his journey.
Andrew P. Bakaj, Esq. and I. Charles McCullough, Esq.
– End –
Washington, DC – Compass Rose Legal Group has successfully concluded its representation of former client David Grush on matters limited to his reasonable belief that elements of the Intelligence Community improperly withheld or concealed alleged classified information from the U.S. Congress. The firm filed a narrowly-scoped whistleblower disclosure with the Intelligence Community Inspector General (“ICIG”) and associated personnel matters – and had represented Mr. Grusch since February 2022.
Recent media articles misstate the scope of the firm’s representation, and include material misstatements of fact pertaining to our representation, which we have requested be corrected.
The whistleblower disclosure did not speak to the specifics of the alleged classified information that Mr. Grusch has now publicly characterized, and the substance of that information has always been outside of the scope of Compass Rose’s representation. Compass Rose took no position and takes no position on the contents of the withheld information.
The ICIG found Mr. Grusch’s assertion that information was inappropriately concealed from Congress to be urgent and credible in response to the filed disclosure. Compass Rose brought this matter to the ICIG’s attention through lawful channels and successfully defended Mr. Grusch against retaliation.
We wish our former client the very best in the next steps of his journey.
Andrew P. Bakaj, Esq. and I. Charles McCullough, Esq.
– End –
