Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av Budikate
a) Skulle man generalisera något så kan man med största sannolikhet säga att vid en intervju av en person i en veckotidning så stämmer säkert 90%.---
Verkligen intressant och relevant, tönt.
Fortsätt du att läsa dina käringtidningar, det är ju den mentala nivå du ligger på. Är du 25% vurststinn plattysk och 75% lipande khazarjude?
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av d00rkey
"---Så du hävdar alltså (återigen och med en viss bestämdhet) att "om det nu är" Suchomel på filmen så vet han innerst inne att Förintelsen inte ägt rum och ändå väljer han att utförligt berätta om den Förintelse som han tror att intervjuaren vill höra... utförligt och med en viss stringens?? "Om det nu är" Suchomel så väljer han, som tidigare SS-man, att (utförligt och med en viss stringens) smutskasta Tyskland och det tyska folket för sin egen snöda vinnings eller fortsatta frihets skull.. Istället för att bara ge Lanzmann ett riktigt långfinger!?? (Äh, jag häpnar!)---"
Om det är Suchomel som talade med Lanzmann så uttryckte han verkligen inget "stringent" om (det imaginära) "Förintelselägret Treblinka". Dessutom skulle han som sagt vid ett förnekande ha ställts inför rätta igen, och Lanzmann hade inte tagit med episoden i sin israeliskfinansierade propagandalögnfilm:
http://forum.codoh.info/viewtopic.php?t=1204&highlight=suchomel
Citat:
"---The interview with Suchomel was purportedly done without his knowledge. I have my doubts. Furthermore, there are a number of absurdities in his account, including the idea that the Jews were taught a song before they were filed into the gas chamber. Yeah, sure.
Suchomel was tried, and anyone put on trial in Germany for these offenses was liable to be tried again, if they ever changed their testimony. That's what happened to Oberhauser, who recanted his Belzec testimony later on. (That's why he wouldn't talk to Lanzmann) Therefore, it is a certainty that Suchomel would not say anything to violate the ordained story, under threat that Lanzmann could make a complaint and have him put on trial again.
Suchomel says something like 60% of the transports died in the cars or committed suicide. Laughable. With no evidence to support it, his gassing claims are compromised as well.
He says a tank (diesel) engine was used to gas Jews. The inefficiency of a tank engine to provide CO is well known. To improvise a CO producer the last thing they would use would be a diesel: they'd use wood-burning producer gas engines which were prominent at that time.
remains: Ground Penetrating Radar has shown the allged mass grave for the alleged 900,000 Jews at Treblinka does not exist. The Believers cannot show us otherwise.
So basically, what Suchomel provides is a repetition of the story of what supposedly occurred at Treblinka as proclaimed in the verdict of his own trial, and which he dare not contradict. The physical and forensic evidence does not support the claim. There is no documentary evidence.---"
Suchomel was tried, and anyone put on trial in Germany for these offenses was liable to be tried again, if they ever changed their testimony. That's what happened to Oberhauser, who recanted his Belzec testimony later on. (That's why he wouldn't talk to Lanzmann) Therefore, it is a certainty that Suchomel would not say anything to violate the ordained story, under threat that Lanzmann could make a complaint and have him put on trial again.
Suchomel says something like 60% of the transports died in the cars or committed suicide. Laughable. With no evidence to support it, his gassing claims are compromised as well.
He says a tank (diesel) engine was used to gas Jews. The inefficiency of a tank engine to provide CO is well known. To improvise a CO producer the last thing they would use would be a diesel: they'd use wood-burning producer gas engines which were prominent at that time.
remains: Ground Penetrating Radar has shown the allged mass grave for the alleged 900,000 Jews at Treblinka does not exist. The Believers cannot show us otherwise.
So basically, what Suchomel provides is a repetition of the story of what supposedly occurred at Treblinka as proclaimed in the verdict of his own trial, and which he dare not contradict. The physical and forensic evidence does not support the claim. There is no documentary evidence.---"
Figuren som intervjuas uttrycker sig som Faurisson konstaterar vagt och luddigt om denna mytiska "gasning" - givetvis därför att han inte har bevittnat någon sådan process.
Den sång judarna fick lära sig innan de marscherade in i "gaskammarna"?
Och vem kan väl tvivla på Toivi Blatt? Vänlige Viktor gör det inte i alla fall, han tror t.o.m. på Moshe Peers story om att som litet barn ha överlevt sex "gasningar" i ett läger där ingen ens på Yad Vashem längre fantiserar om att det fanns homicidala gaskammare:
