Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Klamdamp
Hr finns en intressant artikel:
http://etheric.com/bosnian-pyramid-c...-civilization/
Vad r detta tycker ni?
Dr Paul LaViolette.
En snabb googling p hans namn sger det mesta.
Och han fr dessutom chansen att frelsa lite om sina mnen och intressen.
I lectured later that day, speaking about the gigantic ice age floods that once swept through that region, how they covered the pyramid with flood deposits. I also spoke a bit about galactic superwaves and about advanced science concepts encoded in ancient constellation lore.
Fast han r tydligen enormt nydanande inom fysik och diverse andra mnen.
http://ufology.wikia.com/wiki/Paul_LaViolette
He is the developer of subquantum kinetics, a novel approach to microphysics that accounts for electric, magnetic, gravitational, and nuclear forces in a unified manner and resolves many long-standing physics problems. Based on the predictions of this theory, he developed an alternative cosmology that effectively replaces the big bang theory. Dr. LaViolette has also developed a new theory of gravity that replaces the deeply flawed theory of general relativity. Predicted from subquantum kinetics, it accounts for the electrogravitic coupling phenomenon discovered by Townsend Brown and may explain the advanced aerospace propulsion technology utilized in the B-2 bomber.
Mycket imponerande, inte minst att han har lyckats f fram en gravitationsteori....som dock ingen annan fysiker har ngot strre intresse av.
Och dessutom Subquantum kinetics, ett mycket intressant mne, som dock endast verkar forskas i av ett enda institut.....LaViolette's eget The Starburst Foundation.....
Och jag visste inte att General Electrics F-118 jetmotor var betecknad som "advanced aerospace propulsion technology".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_F118
In addition to his understanding of UFO and black budget craft propulsion systems, including materialization and dematerialization, he has deep knowledge of the inner workings of the U.S. Patent Office.
N, det sista, om insikt i US patent office kan dremot vara vldigt bra att ha.
He states in this interview that, currently, if an invention doesnt fit into the accepted physics paradigm, the patent examiners immediately reject it thinking it violates the paradigm and must be a mistake. In effect, new energy technologies are the underdog: They dont fit the paradigm so they are left out of the needed funding, or their patents are denied even to the point that the Patent Office is breaking the law. In order to alleviate the current Earth crises of environmental pollution, global warming, etc. and advance as a technological society, we need technologies that dont fit into the old paradigm.
Eller kanske inte.
Jag tror den hr frasen i slutet, som text till en bild (lngst ner, innan kommentarsfltet) fungerar som en bra illustration ver den generella kvalitn p den hr artikeln och dess vetenskapliga plitlighet.
Normally invisible orbs seen floating in the air in my first camera shot.
