Hej!
Jag tänkte fråga om någon av er möjligtvis har lust att hjälpa mig översätta nedanstående stycke till svenska så att det blir lätt att förstå? Mina kunskaper i akademisk engelska är inte de vassaste direkt
"In contrast to official images of audit as a derived and neutral activity, this essay argues that audit is an active process of “making things auditable” which has two components: the negotiation of a legitimate and institutionally acceptable knowledge base; the creation of environments which are receptive to this knowledge base. These two components are explored and clarified in relation to three areas where the concept of auditability has been officially invoked: making public sector research auditable, and hence accountable; making quality auditable; making brand valuations auditable. The choice of these apparently marginal practices is deliberate. They provide an opportunity to observe a “logic of auditability” which is hidden in more established contexts. In the three cases auditability is accomplished by: auditable measures of performance; systems of control; reliance on other experts. After considering each of these areas in turn, their general implications for a “constructivist” understanding of the concept of auditability are developed. The challenges that this may pose for more established frameworks of audit research are considered briefly."
Jag tänkte fråga om någon av er möjligtvis har lust att hjälpa mig översätta nedanstående stycke till svenska så att det blir lätt att förstå? Mina kunskaper i akademisk engelska är inte de vassaste direkt
"In contrast to official images of audit as a derived and neutral activity, this essay argues that audit is an active process of “making things auditable” which has two components: the negotiation of a legitimate and institutionally acceptable knowledge base; the creation of environments which are receptive to this knowledge base. These two components are explored and clarified in relation to three areas where the concept of auditability has been officially invoked: making public sector research auditable, and hence accountable; making quality auditable; making brand valuations auditable. The choice of these apparently marginal practices is deliberate. They provide an opportunity to observe a “logic of auditability” which is hidden in more established contexts. In the three cases auditability is accomplished by: auditable measures of performance; systems of control; reliance on other experts. After considering each of these areas in turn, their general implications for a “constructivist” understanding of the concept of auditability are developed. The challenges that this may pose for more established frameworks of audit research are considered briefly."
