2002-11-21, 08:53
#1
när en taliban försökte skjuta afghanistans president sköt den amerikanska livvakten hela magasinet i sitt automatgevär in mot folkmassan och dödade 3 personer
det blev inget åtal eller kritik eftersom han gjorde sitt jobb
han skulle skydda presidenten och det spelade ingen roll att han dödade flera andra personer än skytten som sköt mot presidenten
först kom skytten och sköt mot presidenten
sen kom det fram en annan man och brottade ner skytten
ytterligare en man kom för att hålla fast skytten
sen kom amerikanen och sköt ihjäl allihop
tycker ni att civila offer är acceptabelt?
hade varit skit om du själv räddade sveriges statsminister från en skytt eller något och att sen livvakten kommer fram till dig och skytten och skjuter ihjäl dig när han tömmer ett helt magasin emot dig med sitt automatgevär
det blev inget åtal eller kritik eftersom han gjorde sitt jobb
han skulle skydda presidenten och det spelade ingen roll att han dödade flera andra personer än skytten som sköt mot presidenten
först kom skytten och sköt mot presidenten
sen kom det fram en annan man och brottade ner skytten
ytterligare en man kom för att hålla fast skytten
sen kom amerikanen och sköt ihjäl allihop
tycker ni att civila offer är acceptabelt?
hade varit skit om du själv räddade sveriges statsminister från en skytt eller något och att sen livvakten kommer fram till dig och skytten och skjuter ihjäl dig när han tömmer ett helt magasin emot dig med sitt automatgevär
Citat:
According to an eyewitness, and Afghan boy neared Karzai’s vehicle. Karazi leaned out to shake his hand, as is the custom, and an Afghan in uniform moved forward and fired between four and eight rounds into the car wounding Kandahar Governor Gul Agha Sherzai in the neck. The assassin, a former Taliban, had been recruited into the Kandahar Palace Guard only 17 days earlier.
A 23-year-old shopkeeper, who had some martial arts background, wrestled the hitman to the ground and another friendly jumped in to assist. At that point the SEAL blazed away with most of a magazine from an MP5 submachine gun, killing all three.
I described the incident to two experienced law-enforcement types who stated that if this incident had occurred in the United States by a law-enforcement department it more than likely it would more than likely been classified as a “bad shooting.” One SWAT team member said, “The SEAL, if he pulled that in the United States, would have been charged with “voluntary manslaughter,” or even “second degree murder.”
But that’s in the United States. A highly decorated Vietnam veteran SEAL gave the other side of story. “Look,” he said, “the mission of the SEALS was to eliminate the threat. What if the Taliban shooter broke away and tossed a grenade in the car: Or pulled out a pistol and popped his target in the face?
The SEAL went on to say, “The assassin certainly met the definition of a threat because he fired a weapon. In this type of situation, in a combat zone, you eliminate the threat and then worry about the collateral damage. The SEAL shooter did the right thing.”
A 23-year-old shopkeeper, who had some martial arts background, wrestled the hitman to the ground and another friendly jumped in to assist. At that point the SEAL blazed away with most of a magazine from an MP5 submachine gun, killing all three.
I described the incident to two experienced law-enforcement types who stated that if this incident had occurred in the United States by a law-enforcement department it more than likely it would more than likely been classified as a “bad shooting.” One SWAT team member said, “The SEAL, if he pulled that in the United States, would have been charged with “voluntary manslaughter,” or even “second degree murder.”
But that’s in the United States. A highly decorated Vietnam veteran SEAL gave the other side of story. “Look,” he said, “the mission of the SEALS was to eliminate the threat. What if the Taliban shooter broke away and tossed a grenade in the car: Or pulled out a pistol and popped his target in the face?
The SEAL went on to say, “The assassin certainly met the definition of a threat because he fired a weapon. In this type of situation, in a combat zone, you eliminate the threat and then worry about the collateral damage. The SEAL shooter did the right thing.”