Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av Mr-Zen
---------------
Tidningar som refererar till andra tidningar gör inte en historia till sann..
....hört talas om nyhetsdrev ???
--> Fejk
http://gizmodo.com/5895235/cgi-exper...rd-man-is-fake
Haha, det här är fan roligt.... har läst artikeln i gizmodo och jag kan tycka att den är rätt oseriöst skriven. Vet inte om Gizmodo är en seriös källa, men dom här såkallade cgi-experterna säger bl.a detta:
Citat:
Okay, so I don't see any glaring visual problems, but that's expected when the quality is as shitty as this.
Citat:
Employee 3: "I agree, I saw that earlier today. I can't spot any glaring visual problems, but the physics just don't add up."
Citat:
Employee 4: "Bad physics, shaky cam with bad focus (always a giveaway) and the most steady head I've ever seen on a guy flapping his arms in order to not break every bone in his body. FAKE."
Citat:
Employee 6: " it is a matter of weight ratios! Have a look at the gossamer condor surface area of the wing to sustain flight at 1.5 miles an hour."
Citat:
Employee 8: "I constantly see gliders taking off (Fort Funston in Daly City) and It doesn't look right to me /.../ - the wing clothing material looks CGI."
Citat:
Employee 9: "Look how steady the GoPro footage is. You seriously think his neck is that stable when flapping his arms? To get that high and not move your head around an inch to take in the view?
Citat:
Employee 10: I have to wonder where the power is coming from (where are the batteries, etc). The most efficient for human transportation appears to be a fixed wing aircraft.
Citat:
Employee 11: "The wing-loading is crazy. ,,.,,I think the animation cycle on the figure is borrowed from the monkeys in Wizard of Oz."
Va fan.... det där är inte cgi-experter?