2012-02-08, 20:05
#1
Om man googlar på NDAA eller National Defense Authorization Act kommer Wikipedia upp som första resultat som sig bör. Det konstiga är dock att.. det står ingenting om lagen!
Hur kommer det sig att det inte finns någon information på Wikipedia om en av de mest kontroversiella lagarna någonsin?
så här säger wikipedia om NDAA:
Så här står det på en random sida man hittar om man googlar:
???
Hur kommer det sig att det inte finns någon information på Wikipedia om en av de mest kontroversiella lagarna någonsin?
så här säger wikipedia om NDAA:
Citat:
The National Defense Authorization Act is a United States federal law specifying the budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense.[1] Each year's act also includes other provisions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...horization_Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...horization_Act
Så här står det på en random sida man hittar om man googlar:
Citat:
So why exactly are people freaking out about this bill?
While it is easy to believe that because most of us aren't terrorists or breaking any laws, that we have no reason to be concerned — we took a close look at the language of the 2012 NDAA amendments to see where exactly the facts lie.
Section 1021 of the NDAA allows the U.S. military to indefinitely detain, without due process, any person engaged in "hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners ... without trial until the end of hostilities."
Section 1022 expressly states that the military will imprison anyone who is a member of al-Qaeda or "an associated force" that acts like al-Qaeda; and anyone who planned or carried out an attack, or attempted attack, against the U.S.
Section 1022 continues that detaining American citizens is not required. "UNITED STATES CITIZENS — The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States."
The bottom line is the government can imprison anyone suspected of or even associated with terrorism. This power is open to wide interpretation and could certainly be abused.
Read more: http://articles.businessinsider.com/...ce-authorities
While it is easy to believe that because most of us aren't terrorists or breaking any laws, that we have no reason to be concerned — we took a close look at the language of the 2012 NDAA amendments to see where exactly the facts lie.
Section 1021 of the NDAA allows the U.S. military to indefinitely detain, without due process, any person engaged in "hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners ... without trial until the end of hostilities."
Section 1022 expressly states that the military will imprison anyone who is a member of al-Qaeda or "an associated force" that acts like al-Qaeda; and anyone who planned or carried out an attack, or attempted attack, against the U.S.
Section 1022 continues that detaining American citizens is not required. "UNITED STATES CITIZENS — The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States."
The bottom line is the government can imprison anyone suspected of or even associated with terrorism. This power is open to wide interpretation and could certainly be abused.
Read more: http://articles.businessinsider.com/...ce-authorities
???
Jag brukar reta mig som f-n på detta i artiklar den senaste tiden, och förvirringen kommer som ett brev på posten.
