[WW2] - Auschwitz

Under en koncentration på 5,6 % finns det ingen möjlighet för en explosion. Det motsvarar i runda tal 50 gram HCN per kubikmeter.

en lokal med många människor behöver man inte värma för att få upp temperaturen

det fanns stora fläkter för att ventilera ut cyanväte innan tvångsarbetarna skulle gå in, osv, osv.

"---"Final Determinations

A: The investigation of the formation and stability of traces of cyanide in masonry of the indicated structures as well as interpretation of the analytic results of samples of building material from these structures in Auschwitz shows:

Cyanide reacting in masonry to produce iron blue is stable over periods of many centuries. It disintegrates on the same time scale as the masonry itself. Therefore, traces of cyanide should be detectible today in almost undiminished concentrations, regardless of the effects of weather. The outer walls of the delousing chambers BW 5a/b in Birkenau, which are deep blue and contain high concentrations of cyanide, are evidence of this.
Under the physically possible conditions of the mass gassing of humans with Prussic acid, traces of cyanide must be found in the same range of concentration in the rooms in question as they are found in the clothing delousing structures, and the resulting blue discoloration of the walls should likewise be present.
In the supposed "gas chambers" the concentrations of cyanide remnants are no higher than in any other building taken at random.
Conclusion to A:

On physical-chemical grounds, the mass gassings with Prussic acid in the supposed "gas chambers" of Auschwitz claimed by witnesses could not have taken place.

B: The investigation of the events of the mass gassings in the indicated rooms claimed by witnesses, from a technical and practical standpoint, including physical-chemical analysis, showed:

The supposed main gassing chambers of Auschwitz, the morgue hall of the crematory in the main camp and the morgue cellars I ("gas chambers") of crematories II and III, did not have any means for the introduction of poison gas mixtures. The holes in the roofs visible today were made after the war.
The release of lethal quantities of Prussic acid from the agent requires many times the time testified to; the time runs to several hours.
To provide the necessary ventilation for the supposed "gas chambers" of crematories II and III, given one change of air every 15 minutes, would have taken at least 2 hours, contrary to all witness testimony.
It was not possible to provide an effective ventilation of the supposed "gas chambers" of crematories IV or V or of bunkers I and II. The corpses could not have been removed from the rooms and carried away by the Sonderkommando without protective clothing and use of gas masks with special filters.
Conclusion to B:

The procedures of mass gassing narrated in witness testimony given before the courts, cited in judicial rulings and described in scientific and literary publications, in any building of Auschwitz whatever, are not consistent with natural scientific law.

Diplom Chemist Germar Rudolf, Stuttgart, 14.3.1993

DECLARATION

The author of this expert report can rely only on witness statements and documents now in existence, which alone are the basis for the current historical description of the questions here studied.

If the belief prevails that the witnesses erred in their testimony, the expert witness declares that there is thereby no further reason for the commissioning of an expert report, and, in his opinion, also no further reason that can justify sentencing by the courts, the fixing of history by penal law and the criminal prosecution of certain speech.

The invention of new scenarios and techniques of mass murder which contradict the witness testimony is characteristic of Hollywood's horror factory, but has nothing to do with the writing of history."

"State Attorney's Office Stuttgart, Az. 4 Js 34417/93 19.04.1994

Charges against Germar Rudolf [...]

The accused denies [...] not only the commonly acknowledged fact of the systematic mass-murder of Jews [...] in a manner directed at the honor of the Jews [...] moreover, motivated to excuse National Socialism from the blot of the murder of the Jews by an at least partial identification with the National Socialist persecutions, he attempts to deny — not least through scorn of the statements of witnesses who were victims of the persecution — the particular destiny of Jews of persecution during the National Socialist era. [...]

The accused's committed intention to diminish the suffering of Jews concretely affected is clear, for one thing, from the tendentious, hate-provoking choice of words. [...]

From the contents of the "expert report" [...], it can be seen that the accused identifies with the race ideology of National Socialism and is thereby motivated to awaken and stir up hostile feelings against Jews. [...]"

As proof of these accusations the State Attorney cited the above-given conclusions of the Rudolf Expert Report. We recommend that the State Attorney in question, State Attorney Arndt, submit herself for psychiatric examination.

Comments of some historians on the Rudolf Expert Report
"I am very impressed. To my knowledge you are the first technical expert in Germany who has tackled this complex subject in a flawless and scientifically sound manner. I do not hesitate to say that your expert report may serve as an ice-breaker. The political-historical effects that will come from it are easy to see, although their full scope can not now be told."

Prof. Dr. Hellmut Diwald, 22.1.1992

"I have read it with great interest, and I am only sorry that I am no longer as proficient in rebus chemicis as I was a half-century ago before taking my Abitur. However, my impression is that this expert report is an important contribution to a very important question, whose answer has become more pressing since the "Leuchter Report". ... It can only be hoped that the well-known tactic of killing by silence will not be applied here, and that responses and comments will be forthcoming."

Prof. Dr. Ernst Nolte, 28.1.1992

"I count the receipt of your study to be one of the high points of knowledge that one can experience in our time. I share my joy and thankfulness for your research endeavors with not a few colleagues working in the area of contemporary history, especially in respect to the results of your strictly scientific investigations."

Prof. Dr. Werner Georg Haverbeck, 31.1.1992

"I have read your study at leisure. It gives me hope to see that a member of the younger generation has bravely undertaken to get to the bottom of a question disputed world-wide in a disinterested manner and with scientific thoroughness, clearly superior technical ability and corresponding zeal for research! The result is unequivocal! The truth about things can not be suppressed forever! I hope that your work will be the breakthrough!"

Prof. Dr. Emil Schlee, 1.4.1992

"... I thank you for your graciously sending me the new draft of your expert report. I heartily wish that all writing on this subject were based on such long and intensive work as yours so obviously is. Certainly most of it is unverifiable to the layman, but even the photographs are very informative. Please inform me from time to time when reactions and comments appear."

Prof. Dr. Ernst Nolte, 6.1.1993---"

"---Det hävdas ofta att samtliga av de judar i Auschwitz som inte var kapabla att arbeta, mördades omgående. Judar som var för gamla, unga, sjuka eller svaga påstås ha blivit gasade direkt vid ankomsten, och endast de som kunde tvingas arbeta till döds hölls temporärt vid liv. Men bevis visar att en relativt stor andel av de judiska internerna inte var kapabla att arbeta, samt att dessa ändå inte mördades. Till exempel visar ett internt tyskt telex meddelande, daterat 4 september 1943, från chefen för "arbetskraftsfördelningsavdelningen" vid SS ekonomiska och administrativa huvudkontor (WVHA), att av 25000 judiska interner i Auschwitz så var endast 3581 kapabla att arbeta, och de resterande judiska internerna - ca 21000, eller 86% - inte var arbetsförmögna. (9)

Detta bekräftas även i en hemlig rapport daterad 5 april 1944, som handlar om "säkerhets åtgärder i Auschwitz", skriven av Oswald Pohl, chef för koncentrationsläger systemet inom SS. I rapportren som skickades till Heinrich Himmler, rapporterar Pohl att det totala antalet interner i Auschwitz var 67.000, och av dessa var 18.000 intagna på sjukhuset, eller på annat sätt oförmögna till arbete. I Auschwitz II (Birkenau) fanns det 36.000 interner, merparten av dessa var kvinnor, av vilka "uppskattningsvis 15.000 inte är kapabla att arbeta." (10)

Dessa två dokument är helt enkelt inte förenliga med förintelsemyten i Auschwitz.---"