2010-11-21, 01:50
#1
Det är så att jag har hamnat i en diskussion med en person som säger att det som Adamski var med om har faktiskt hänt. Men jag är inte så säkert på det för att hans bilder ser helt fejkat ut.
Här är diskussionen mellan mig och han:
Clepto:"I think that George was a liar because many of George Adamski´s photos are hoax and it is a shame for those people who take ufology seriously. I am 100 percent sure that you disagree my opinon but if you do that please send me some evidence."
Detta är hans svar dagen efter: "Yes, quite obviously, I do disagree with you. Someone how my friend, I find your 100% statement very interesting and conflicting, since you are at the same time challenging for information which contradicts your proposed assuredness . I have lived within this subject my entire life, including having known Mr. Adamski and witnessed these crafts many time. Our experiences include showing the Adamski films and photos, BY INVITATION, before 22 scientists at NASA Goddard, the Pentagon, and before a select committee of the British House of Lords. None of the representatives of these organizations reacted negatively or disputed, or belittled these photos and flims. Rather the evidence to support Adamski continues to be overwhelming. So rather than do your research for you, I will refer you to the adamski website page - http://www.adamskifoundation.com/html/AboutGA.htm -which introduces some of the solid evidence behind these photos, evidence which remains some of the best in civilian hands for decades and to this day. In fact, hardly one UFO documentary exists which does not display at least one clip of the Adamski films. You will notice that the Adamski photographs have been examined by photo labs, Movie professionals, Eastman Kodak, Orthographically projection compared, etc, etc. I suugest you research more thoroughly and who knows what you may discover to challenge your thinking"
Har läst någonstans att Adamski påstår att han har besökt månen med sina utomjordiska vänner där han såg människor, träd m.m
Samma dag skickar jag en till fråga
Clepto:"Is it true that George has said that he and aliens flew on the moon and he saw cities, woods etc? He also claims that he saw people walking on the moon and the ironic is that he was on the moon 1965 four year before moon landning. Both you and me know that Nasa didn´t find anything on the moon like cities or something else."
Idag skickar han ett svar: "Actually, let us understand what Adamski described in the context in which he told it. George said that while orbiting the moon, he observed, especially on the back side of the moon, however, not exclusively, that in some of the deep craters, there appeared to be bases consisting of buildings and environmental conditions sealed within a pressurized domes / magnetic shields. Within those structures, he told of vegetation, some types of animals, etc, all part of what one would expect within any self sustaining habitats.
He did mention that in some restricted areas, there appeared to be small tree like shrubs, etc, but he never claimed that the moon was Tahiti.
If we know our physics, we know that just like here on earth, pressure reduces when climbing in altitude, and the inverse applies and compounds as we go deeper than sea level, i.e, the Dead Sea, Death Valley, etc. The high plains of the moon, allowed our lunar module to open the hatch when @ 3 psi equalized inside and out, but that is considered to be the Lunar HIGH altitude, like our Tibetan plateau .... go lower or deeper below sea level, and the pressure increases.
Your statement, "we both know, that NASA didnt find anything like such on the moon", I must ask where in the world have you been getting your information? NASA has both provided information and a cover up when ever they have been instructed too...The British Astronomical Society recored objects as large as many miles long moving along the lunar surface. Now lets jump to both the NASA documents "Chronological observations of the moon" Goddard, 1967, and the accounts of our astronauts accounts describing colored lights moving along the surface. Deep craters with luminescent glow. Observations of both clouds, and fog, which requires moisture, i.e water - also described by Apollo 12 astronauts geysers spraying out of the lunar surface for 17 hours. etc, etc.
Adamski said there was water on the moon, and NOW we know for a fact this is true. Adamski said there was limited atmospheric pressure on the moon, depending on above or below its calculated sea level and that has been proven true. Adamski talked about clouds and fog moving along the crater rims, and of areas where there are alien bases, and that too has been collaborated.
If you like, and you wish to send my your mailing address, I will gift you a copy of our book “Alien Bases on the Moon II”, where a great deal of evidence exists. However, if you have done just a little research yourself, you will know that after us many others like Carl Sagan stated the moon was a perfect observation platform for E.Ts, Richard Hoagland has also paralleled our research with some of his own, as have Graham Handcock, etc, etc….. I know that there is a lot negative said about Adamski, usually from sources that had NO scientific credentials nor have provided any proof to contradict him. I also know there are some UFO personalities who have made a job out of bashing others in the attempt to establish their prominence, while conducting questionable activities themselves..... BUT I can only say after 45 years in this subject, those others sooner or later all fade away and Adamski remains strong and true."
Nu till frågan: Har någon här en länk till en bra hemsida som stärker det som jag har frågat honom?
Ni kan gärna komma med frågor som ni gärna vill fråga denna person.
Förlåt att det blev lång text att läsa och ber om ursäkt för min engelska
Här är diskussionen mellan mig och han:
Clepto:"I think that George was a liar because many of George Adamski´s photos are hoax and it is a shame for those people who take ufology seriously. I am 100 percent sure that you disagree my opinon but if you do that please send me some evidence."
Detta är hans svar dagen efter: "Yes, quite obviously, I do disagree with you. Someone how my friend, I find your 100% statement very interesting and conflicting, since you are at the same time challenging for information which contradicts your proposed assuredness . I have lived within this subject my entire life, including having known Mr. Adamski and witnessed these crafts many time. Our experiences include showing the Adamski films and photos, BY INVITATION, before 22 scientists at NASA Goddard, the Pentagon, and before a select committee of the British House of Lords. None of the representatives of these organizations reacted negatively or disputed, or belittled these photos and flims. Rather the evidence to support Adamski continues to be overwhelming. So rather than do your research for you, I will refer you to the adamski website page - http://www.adamskifoundation.com/html/AboutGA.htm -which introduces some of the solid evidence behind these photos, evidence which remains some of the best in civilian hands for decades and to this day. In fact, hardly one UFO documentary exists which does not display at least one clip of the Adamski films. You will notice that the Adamski photographs have been examined by photo labs, Movie professionals, Eastman Kodak, Orthographically projection compared, etc, etc. I suugest you research more thoroughly and who knows what you may discover to challenge your thinking"
Har läst någonstans att Adamski påstår att han har besökt månen med sina utomjordiska vänner där han såg människor, träd m.m
Samma dag skickar jag en till fråga
Clepto:"Is it true that George has said that he and aliens flew on the moon and he saw cities, woods etc? He also claims that he saw people walking on the moon and the ironic is that he was on the moon 1965 four year before moon landning. Both you and me know that Nasa didn´t find anything on the moon like cities or something else."
Idag skickar han ett svar: "Actually, let us understand what Adamski described in the context in which he told it. George said that while orbiting the moon, he observed, especially on the back side of the moon, however, not exclusively, that in some of the deep craters, there appeared to be bases consisting of buildings and environmental conditions sealed within a pressurized domes / magnetic shields. Within those structures, he told of vegetation, some types of animals, etc, all part of what one would expect within any self sustaining habitats.
He did mention that in some restricted areas, there appeared to be small tree like shrubs, etc, but he never claimed that the moon was Tahiti.
If we know our physics, we know that just like here on earth, pressure reduces when climbing in altitude, and the inverse applies and compounds as we go deeper than sea level, i.e, the Dead Sea, Death Valley, etc. The high plains of the moon, allowed our lunar module to open the hatch when @ 3 psi equalized inside and out, but that is considered to be the Lunar HIGH altitude, like our Tibetan plateau .... go lower or deeper below sea level, and the pressure increases.
Your statement, "we both know, that NASA didnt find anything like such on the moon", I must ask where in the world have you been getting your information? NASA has both provided information and a cover up when ever they have been instructed too...The British Astronomical Society recored objects as large as many miles long moving along the lunar surface. Now lets jump to both the NASA documents "Chronological observations of the moon" Goddard, 1967, and the accounts of our astronauts accounts describing colored lights moving along the surface. Deep craters with luminescent glow. Observations of both clouds, and fog, which requires moisture, i.e water - also described by Apollo 12 astronauts geysers spraying out of the lunar surface for 17 hours. etc, etc.
Adamski said there was water on the moon, and NOW we know for a fact this is true. Adamski said there was limited atmospheric pressure on the moon, depending on above or below its calculated sea level and that has been proven true. Adamski talked about clouds and fog moving along the crater rims, and of areas where there are alien bases, and that too has been collaborated.
If you like, and you wish to send my your mailing address, I will gift you a copy of our book “Alien Bases on the Moon II”, where a great deal of evidence exists. However, if you have done just a little research yourself, you will know that after us many others like Carl Sagan stated the moon was a perfect observation platform for E.Ts, Richard Hoagland has also paralleled our research with some of his own, as have Graham Handcock, etc, etc….. I know that there is a lot negative said about Adamski, usually from sources that had NO scientific credentials nor have provided any proof to contradict him. I also know there are some UFO personalities who have made a job out of bashing others in the attempt to establish their prominence, while conducting questionable activities themselves..... BUT I can only say after 45 years in this subject, those others sooner or later all fade away and Adamski remains strong and true."
Nu till frågan: Har någon här en länk till en bra hemsida som stärker det som jag har frågat honom?
Ni kan gärna komma med frågor som ni gärna vill fråga denna person.
Förlåt att det blev lång text att läsa och ber om ursäkt för min engelska
