Assang är inte åtalad för något brott men har hållits i husarrest (fotboja) i två år innan han sökte asyl på Ambassaden i london. Utlämning till sverige är officiellt bara för förhör om ett påstått brott (som avskrivits en gång).
Assange förväntar sig att när han väl befinner sig i Svenskt fängelse kommer nya åtalspunkter att dyka upp (som på beställning). Sverige vägrar förhöra honom i london men kan/vill inte ge någon motivering, så det finns fog för hans misstankar.
En central fråga i sammanhanget är ju då om Assange kan förvänta sig en rättssäker behandling i USA om/när han utlämnas dit.
USAs VP Joe Biden har kallat Assange "high tech terrorist" i tv.
Tankeväckande intervju med Assange själv:
http://translate.google.com/translat...012-09-23.html
"A high-tech terrorist - Now excuse me, I have to go and fire hellfire-missiles at an Afgan weddingparty, using remote-controlled aircraft at 40.000 feet" -Joe Biden(?)
Assange förväntar sig att när han väl befinner sig i Svenskt fängelse kommer nya åtalspunkter att dyka upp (som på beställning). Sverige vägrar förhöra honom i london men kan/vill inte ge någon motivering, så det finns fog för hans misstankar.
En central fråga i sammanhanget är ju då om Assange kan förvänta sig en rättssäker behandling i USA om/när han utlämnas dit.
USAs VP Joe Biden har kallat Assange "high tech terrorist" i tv.
Tankeväckande intervju med Assange själv:
Citat:
What do you think of President Barack Obama?
-What I think of him as a person does not think it's relevant. I am interested in the effect produced, so I will not speculate whether Obama is a good guy or not. I think his political effect is very corrosive and dangerous. If we compare the last two years of Bush with Obama last four years, then in an instant I choose the last two years of Bush. And if we ask what was the big change under the Obama administration, is that we extrajudicial detention extrajudicial killings. We, in the U.S. context, to kidnap foreigners to extrajudicially extrajudicially kill U.S. citizens.
- U.S. citizens?
-For example Anwar al Awlaki and his son, U.S. citizens killed in a drone attack (drones) in Yemen. They were killed. Now we have a White House where President checks every Tuesday a file with names and photos of people to choose who to kill in secret, summarily, without any judicial process, without any public oversight. In fact my lawyers in the United States, the Center for Constitutional Rights, tried to open a case to prevent one of those people who suspected him asesinables list, but the government has defined the legal representation of suspected terrorists and terrorism assistance , for which U.S. lawyers have been sent to jail. So they could not even claim that this person should not be killed in a secret process, because such a defense would be interpreted as a support for terrorism.
-What I think of him as a person does not think it's relevant. I am interested in the effect produced, so I will not speculate whether Obama is a good guy or not. I think his political effect is very corrosive and dangerous. If we compare the last two years of Bush with Obama last four years, then in an instant I choose the last two years of Bush. And if we ask what was the big change under the Obama administration, is that we extrajudicial detention extrajudicial killings. We, in the U.S. context, to kidnap foreigners to extrajudicially extrajudicially kill U.S. citizens.
- U.S. citizens?
-For example Anwar al Awlaki and his son, U.S. citizens killed in a drone attack (drones) in Yemen. They were killed. Now we have a White House where President checks every Tuesday a file with names and photos of people to choose who to kill in secret, summarily, without any judicial process, without any public oversight. In fact my lawyers in the United States, the Center for Constitutional Rights, tried to open a case to prevent one of those people who suspected him asesinables list, but the government has defined the legal representation of suspected terrorists and terrorism assistance , for which U.S. lawyers have been sent to jail. So they could not even claim that this person should not be killed in a secret process, because such a defense would be interpreted as a support for terrorism.
http://translate.google.com/translat...012-09-23.html
"A high-tech terrorist - Now excuse me, I have to go and fire hellfire-missiles at an Afgan weddingparty, using remote-controlled aircraft at 40.000 feet" -Joe Biden(?)
__________________
Senast redigerad av TheFatController 2012-10-28 kl. 23:22.
Senast redigerad av TheFatController 2012-10-28 kl. 23:22.