Marko Rodin - Vortex based mathematics

Welcome

Marko Rodin has discovered the source of the non-decaying spin of the electron. Although scientists know that all electrons in the universe spin they have never discovered the source of this spin. Rodin has. He has discovered the underpinning geometry of the universe, the fabric of time itself. He has done this by reducing all higher mathematics – calculus, geometry, scalar math – to discrete-number mathematics.
With the introduction of Vortex-Based Mathematics you will be able to see how energy is expressing itself mathematically. This math has no anomalies and shows the dimensional shape and function of the universe as being a toroid or donut-shaped black hole. This is the template for the universe and it is all within our base ten decimal system!

...

Introduction of Rodin Coil and Vortex Based Mathematics PDF Print E-mail

As Russell Blake, senior researcher from Microsoft, has said of Marko's work, "This fantastic coherence has existed since the beginning of time but has yet to be harnessed by mankind and the potential is truly mind-boggling."

Mathematics as we know it today is only a tool to symbolize quantities. Vortex-Based Mathematics (VBM) is completely different because it is a dynamic math that shows the relationships and thus the qualities of numbers rather than the quantities.

Marko studied all the world's great religions. He decided to take The Most Great Name of Bahaullah (prophet of the Bahai Faith) which is Abha and convert it into numbers. He did this in an effort to discover the true precise mystical intonation of The Most Great Name of God. Since the Bahai sacred scripture was originally written in Persian and Arabic, Marko used the Abjad numerical notation system for this letter to number translation. This was a sacred system of allocating a unique numerical value to each letter of the 27 letters of the alphabet so that secret quantum mechanic physics could be encoded into words. What Marko discovered was that (A=1, b=2, h=5, a=1) = 9. The fact that The Most Great Name of God equaled 9 seemed very important to him as everything he had read in both the Bahai scriptures and other religious text spoke of nine being the omni-potent number. So next he drew out a circle with nine on top and 1 through 8 going around the circle clockwise. Then he discovered a very intriguing number system within this circle. Marko knew he had stumbled upon something very profound. This circle with its hidden number sequence was the "Symbol of Enlightenment." This is the MATHEMATICAL FINGER PRINT OF GOD.


källa: http://www.markorodin.com/content/view/7/26/


Är killen en bluff eller the real deal? Vad säger ni?

Bluff. Ett ovanligt tydligt fall av sådant. Han har i och för sig upptäckt några (någorlunda) intressanta egenskaper hos det decimala talsystemet (t.ex. att siffersumman av tvåpotenserna repeterar sig i ett mönster 1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5), men steget därifrån till

Nature is expressing herself with numbers. The symmetry of our decimal system is a principle of nature. The 9 axis causes the doubling circuit and it is the point towards which matter converges and away from which it diverges or expands. Thus the polar number pairs will be mirror images of each other, both flowing in opposite directions from the central axis. There is perfect symmetry wrapped around a single point coiling outwards the way that petals are wrapped in a rose, or a nautilus shell spirals outward.

(och vad fan exakt är innehållet i det här stycket???)

känns lite tunt, minst sagt.

Killen har hittat roliga mönster bland talen och sedan ballat ur helt och börjat babbla om guds fingeravtryck?

Marko har funnit ett begrepp som varit känt i hundratals år och som lärs ut i en grundläggande kurs i matematik på universitetet.

Kongruenser modulo ett heltal.

Tycker dock att det är synd om de som donerat pengar till det här tramset.

Bump!

Men vad vill du höra egentligen? Det är ju uppenbart att det bara är idioti, och inte alls lika charmigt som time cube.

Om det nu är så uppenbart så borde du kunna komma med ett argument eller inte skriva alls. Har aldrig förstått varför man tar sig tid att skriva totalt meningslösa kommenterar på det sättet.

Du har redan fått motargument i andra inlägget och dessa ignorerade du.

tänker du möjligtvis på detta "motargumentet";
"(och vad fan exakt är innehållet i det här stycket???)

känns lite tunt, minst sagt."

hmm...intressant..

Han påpekade att författaren ordbajsar utan att egentligen säga något.

Bra att du tar dig tid att klara ut saker.