2009-12-23, 13:19
#1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceland....28930-1262.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceland....28930-1262.29
Island under medeltiden tas upp som ett exempel på fungerande anarkokapitalism ibland. Men de hade ju just de problem som folk fruktar och upplöstes pga dem.
Blodfejder i rättstvister och till slut tog ett fåtal familjer över.
Vad ska göras annorlunda denna gången? Som jag ser det så leder frånvarande av en stat högst troligt till konkurrerande maffior och det blir inte ett stabilt samhälle förrän våldsmonopolet är återinfört.
Citat:
In 930, the ruling chiefs established an assembly called the Alþingi (Althing). The parliament convened each summer at Þingvellir, where representative chieftains (Goðorðsmenn or Goðar) amended laws, settled disputes and appointed juries to judge lawsuits. Laws were not written down, but were instead memorized by an elected Lawspeaker (lögsögumaður). The Alþingi is sometimes stated to be the world's oldest existing parliament. Importantly, there was no central executive power, and therefore laws were enforced only by the people. This gave rise to blood-feuds, which provided the writers of the Icelanders' sagas with plenty of material.
Iceland enjoyed a mostly uninterrupted period of growth in its commonwealth years. Settlements from that era have been found in southwest Greenland and eastern Canada, and sagas such as Eiríks saga Rauða and Grænlendinga saga speak of the settlers' exploits.
Iceland enjoyed a mostly uninterrupted period of growth in its commonwealth years. Settlements from that era have been found in southwest Greenland and eastern Canada, and sagas such as Eiríks saga Rauða and Grænlendinga saga speak of the settlers' exploits.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceland....28930-1262.29
Citat:
During the 11th and 12th centuries, the centralization of power had worn down the institutions of the Commonwealth, as the former, notable independence of local farmers and chieftains gave way to the growing power of a handful of families and their leaders. The period from around 1200 to 1262 is generally known as Sturlungaöld, the "Age of the Sturlungs." This refers to Sturla Þórðarson and his sons Þórður, Sighvatur, and Snorri, who were one of two main clans fighting for power over Iceland, causing havoc in a land comprised almost entirely of farmers who could ill-afford to travel far from their farms to travel across the island to fight for their leaders. In 1220 Snorri Sturluson became a vassal of Haakon IV of Norway; his nephew Sturla Sighvatsson also became a vassal in 1235. Sturla used the power and influence of the Sturlungar family to wage war against the other clans in Iceland. After decades of conflict, the Icelandic chieftains agreed to accept the sovereignty of Norway and signed the Old Covenant (Gamli sáttmáli) establishing a union with the Norwegian monarchy.
[edit] Little Ice Age
[edit] Little Ice Age
Island under medeltiden tas upp som ett exempel på fungerande anarkokapitalism ibland. Men de hade ju just de problem som folk fruktar och upplöstes pga dem.
Blodfejder i rättstvister och till slut tog ett fåtal familjer över.
Vad ska göras annorlunda denna gången? Som jag ser det så leder frånvarande av en stat högst troligt till konkurrerande maffior och det blir inte ett stabilt samhälle förrän våldsmonopolet är återinfört.