Vinnaren i pepparkakshustävlingen!
2018-05-17, 18:22
  #1621
Avstängd
wwrs avatar
Citat:
EU to activate law that bans European companies from complying with US sanctions against Iran.
...
It also does not recognise any court rulings that enforce American penalties.
...
Juncker said the European Commission has decided to allow the European Investment Bank to facilitate European companies' investment in Iran for the first time. That could allow more euro-dominated loans to Iran.

Bijan Zangeneh, Iran's oil minister, also announced that Chinese state-owned oil company CNPC was ready to replace Total in Iran if the French energy giant pulls out.


I referensen påstår vissa att dessa blockeringslagar är svåra att genomföra, dock.

3:e VK lär det inte leda till i alla fall, kul att följa. Undrar vad USA har för planer. Affärerna går väl till Kina etc istället? Märkligt? Få se vad som händer.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/...134848253.html
__________________
Senast redigerad av wwr 2018-05-17 kl. 18:31.
Citera
2018-05-17, 18:34
  #1622
Medlem
arbetets avatar
Hittade den här artikeln som är tre år gammal:

World News
August 12, 2015 / 8:33 AM / 3 years ago


Dollar could suffer if U.S. walks away from Iran deal: John Kerry
NEW YORK (Reuters) - If the United States walks away from the nuclear deal with Iran and demands that its allies comply with U.S. sanctions, a loss of confidence in U.S. leadership could threaten the dollar’s position as the world’s reserve currency, the top U.S. diplomat said on Tuesday.

“If we turn around and nix the deal and then tell them, ‘You’re going to have to obey our rules and sanctions anyway,’ that is a recipe, very quickly ... for the American dollar to cease to be the reserve currency of the world,” U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said at a Reuters Newsmaker event.

Defending the July 14 Vienna agreement between Iran and world powers that he helped to negotiate, Kerry deployed a new argument in a feverish battle to prevent lawmakers from killing it. Congress has until Sept. 17 to act.

Kerry warned of a potential loss of U.S. financial and political clout. He said this was not something that would happen overnight but many countries were “chafing” under the present international financial arrangements.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-i...0QG1V020150812

Så här sa Obama August 05, 2015
/…/Now, the final criticism -- this sort of a catch-all that you may hear -- is the notion that there’s a better deal to be had. “We should get a better deal” -- that’s repeated over and over again. “It's a bad deal, need a better deal” -- (laughter) -- one that relies on vague promises of toughness, and, more recently, the argument that we can apply a broader and indefinite set of sanctions to squeeze the Iranian regime harder.

Those making this argument are either ignorant of Iranian society, or they’re just not being straight with the American people. Sanctions alone are not going to force Iran to completely dismantle all vestiges of its nuclear infrastructure -- even those aspects that are consistent with peaceful programs. That oftentimes is what the critics are calling “a better deal.” Neither the Iranian government, or the Iranian opposition, or the Iranian people would agree to what they would view as a total surrender of their sovereignty.

Moreover, our closest allies in Europe, or in Asia -- much less China or Russia -- certainly are not going to agree to enforce existing sanctions for another 5, 10, 15 years according to the dictates of the U.S. Congress. Because their willingness to support sanctions in the first place was based on Iran ending its pursuit of nuclear weapons. It was not based on the belief that Iran cannot have peaceful nuclear power. And it certainly wasn’t based on a desire for regime change in Iran.

As a result, those who say we can just walk away from this deal and maintain sanctions are selling a fantasy. Instead of strengthening our position as some have suggested, Congress’s rejection would almost certainly result in multilateral sanctions unraveling. If, as has also been suggested, we tried to maintain unilateral sanctions, beefen them up, we would be standing alone. We cannot dictate the foreign, economic and energy policies of every major power in the world.

In order to even try to do that, we would have to sanction, for example, some of the world’s largest banks. We’d have to cut off countries like China from the American financial system. And since they happen to be major purchasers of or our debt, such actions could trigger severe disruptions in our own economy and, by the way, raise questions internationally about the dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency.

That’s part of the reason why many of the previous unilateral sanctions were waived. What’s more likely to happen, should Congress reject this deal, is that Iran would end up with some form of sanctions relief without having to accept any of the constraints or inspections required by this deal. So in that sense, the critics are right: Walk away from this agreement and you will get a better deal -- for Iran.
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov...n-nuclear-deal

Blir de sannspådda?
Citera
2018-05-18, 11:00
  #1623
Medlem
E.Merckxs avatar
Citat:
wwr skrev

Sådana prognoser har man hört förut.
I nuläget nettoimporterar väl USA olja.

?

Enligt US myndigheter: 8.3 million barrels per dag:

"American exports of crude oil and petroleum products rose to a record 8.3 million barrels a day last week, according to U.S. government data on Wednesday. That compares with top exporter Saudi Arabia’s 9.3 million barrels a day in January, and Russia’s shipments of 7.4 million barrels a day, the bank said."


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...rter-next-year
Citera
2018-05-18, 12:47
  #1624
Avstängd
wwrs avatar
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av wwr
Sådana prognoser har man hört förut.
I nuläget nettoimporterar väl USA olja.


Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av E.Merckx
?

Enligt US myndigheter: 8.3 million barrels per dag:

"American exports of crude oil and petroleum products rose to a record 8.3 million barrels a day last week, according to U.S. government data on Wednesday. That compares with top exporter Saudi Arabia’s 9.3 million barrels a day in January, and Russia’s shipments of 7.4 million barrels a day, the bank said."


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...rter-next-year

Här är en tabell över nettoexport av olja.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...ts?wprov=sfla1

Saudi ligger främst och USA sist vad gäller nettoexport av olja. 119 undersökta lönder. USA är det land som har största nettoimporten olja.

https://i.imgur.com/iMMV7Rq.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/eyUJPaW.jpg
__________________
Senast redigerad av wwr 2018-05-18 kl. 12:54.
Citera
2018-05-18, 13:00
  #1625
Medlem
FlashyBears avatar
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av E.Merckx
?

Enligt US myndigheter: 8.3 million barrels per dag:

"American exports of crude oil and petroleum products rose to a record 8.3 million barrels a day last week, according to U.S. government data on Wednesday. That compares with top exporter Saudi Arabia’s 9.3 million barrels a day in January, and Russia’s shipments of 7.4 million barrels a day, the bank said."


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...rter-next-year

Vad är det du inte fattar?
Som han säger nettoimporterar USA.
Citera
2018-05-18, 13:18
  #1626
Medlem
E.Merckxs avatar
Citat:
wwr skrev

Här är en tabell över nettoexport av olja.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...ts?wprov=sfla1

Enligt den tabellen importerade US 7,900,000 barrels per dag 2018:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...by_oil_imports
Citera
2018-05-18, 13:30
  #1627
Medlem
FlashyBears avatar
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av E.Merckx
Enligt den tabellen importerade US 7,900,000 barrels per dag 2018:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...by_oil_imports

Men din dumbass, ge upp...

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/Le...s=MTTNTUS2&f=M

USA nettoimporterar olja. Punkt. Slut.
Citera
2018-05-18, 13:36
  #1628
Medlem
E.Merckxs avatar
Citat:
FlashyBear skrev

USA nettoimporterar olja. Punkt. Slut.

Den statistiken ar fram till februari, Bloomberg artikeln fran 26 april.
Citera
2018-05-18, 13:41
  #1629
Medlem
FlashyBears avatar
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av E.Merckx
Den statistiken ar fram till februari, Bloomberg artikeln fran 26 april.

Haha, din IQ-befriade tomte.

USA är nettoimportör
Citera
2018-05-18, 13:48
  #1630
Avstängd
wwrs avatar
Nu får vi hoppas Eddy Merckx skojar och inte är ute och cyklar. Men den typen av uppgifter är ju en slags fake news. Läser man snabbt om något så kan man trilla dit.
Citera
2018-05-18, 13:50
  #1631
Medlem
E.Merckxs avatar
Citat:
FlashyBear skrev

USA är nettoimportör

Ha Ha. Ok. Jag far val ge mig da, hittade den senaste statistiken:

05/11/18 -2,467

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_mov...0_mbblpd_w.htm
Citera
2018-05-19, 16:03
  #1632
Medlem
Iran hotar börjar höganrika uran igen om inte EU lever upp till Iranavtalet.

Fimpa dessa jävla hotande araber. Skicka in elitsoldater och utrota dessa jävla extremister så det riktiga iranska folket perserna kan få sitt land tillbaka. Bort med dessa religiösa fanatiker.

Och hur fan kan EU göra avtal under hot? Jävla svartfötter! Fega jävlar.

Och EU säljer sig för olja. Miljö och Parisavtalet? Betyder inte ett skit egentligen.

Sänkt skiten.
Citera

Stöd Flashback

Flashback finansieras genom donationer från våra medlemmar och besökare. Det är med hjälp av dig vi kan fortsätta erbjuda en fri samhällsdebatt. Tack för ditt stöd!

Stöd Flashback