Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
Sqrbanken
De leveranser man fått från BFF-Kimpa för att möta upp konsumtionen nu när de ryska ladorna (av mycket att döma) börjat gapa tomma blir intressant att se effekten av. Precis alla vittnesmål från kriget (och efterspelsbilder vi övriga kunnat ta del av) pekar på att ryssen hittills främst spelat stalinorgel.
Ämnar man fortsätta med detta, vilket 50-70 år gamla granater (om dessa uppgifter stämmer) förmodligen enbart duger till, så vet jag inte riktigt hur det utifrån en Kremlsk ringhörna ska avkasta för en positiv trend/utveckling. Vore onekligen väldigt "ryskt" om det dessutom skulle visa sig att större partier av dessa mognat ner sig till blindgångare eller på något annat vis visar sig vara otjänliga för krigföring.
"The performance of North Korea's artillery and crews has been suspect since the North Korean army fired around 170 shells at the South Korean island of Yeonpyeong in 2010, killing four people.
According to a report by the Washington-based 38 North project, more than half those rounds fell in the waters around the island, while about 20% of those that impacted the island failed to explode.
Such a high failure rate suggested some North Korea-manufactured artillery munitions suffered from either poor quality control during manufacture or poor storage conditions and standards, the report said.
With very large numbers of ammunition, the lack of precision and the occasional dud shells or rockets wouldn't matter much to the Russians, Wezeman said.
"However, it would matter if Korean ammunition is of such poor quality that it is just unsafe to use for Russian soldiers - there have been indications that such quality issues play with Korean ammunition," he added."