Citat:
Hur ? Meteor får endast plats i bombutrummet eller externa balkar. Jag tolkar det som att man kommer att påbörja utvecklingen av uppgraderingarna till vissa delsystem (t.ex. motor, vapenkapacitet etc). En del har hunnit bli rätt omoderna nu och stöd för t.ex. Meteor behöver tas fram eftersom vissa kunder har bestämt sig för att utrusta F-35 med det.
Måste vara ett norskskämt eller....
Citat:
Hahahahaaa OrmenLange är väl tyst vid det här lägetNorge börjar bli oroliga för att Lockheed inte skall hinna bygga färdigt F-35-basen i Bodö innan de första levererade planen skall börja tas i bruk i november. Lockheed har inte ens bokat hotellrum eller boende för sin personal som borde börja installationerna senast efter semestrarna för att hinna bli klara före november. Det är ganska stora installationer med simulatorer mm som skall monteras samt köras in och testas.
Vid den här typen av projekt så brukar man har en tidsplan över lång tid för olika åtgärder, men Lockheed verkar inte ens ha börjat med något utan det enda man vet är att leverans skall ske i november.
Vid den här typen av projekt så brukar man har en tidsplan över lång tid för olika åtgärder, men Lockheed verkar inte ens ha börjat med något utan det enda man vet är att leverans skall ske i november.
Oja. Och glöm inte att alla andra flygplansprojekt håller sina tidsramar.
Såsom t.ex. att Gripen E provflög under sensommaren förra året
och att PAK-FA togs i tjänst innan nyår, med nya motorer och signaturanpassad bakkropp.
Gissningstävling. Vilket flygplan beskrivs:
Citat:
XXXXXXXX noted that:
(1) XXXXXXXX has revised the XXXXXXXX flight test program by decreasing the data collection requirements that were originally planned;
(2) program documents state that, although flight testing is behind schedule, program decisions to reduce test points will enable the XXXXXXXX to regain lost time and complete development testing in XXXXXXXX, as originally planned;
(3) XXXXXXXX program documents identified numerous deficiencies relative to the aircraft's operational performance;
(4) the most challenging technical issue is XXXXXXXX;
(5) until these issues are resolved through software or hardware changes that have been adequately tested, the cost, schedule, and operational performance impact of resolving these deficiencies cannot be determined;
(6) the XXXXXXXX remains confident that it can correct these deficiencies;
(7) in addition, XXXXXXXX that assesses risk areas in the XXXXXXXX program stated in XXXXXXXX, that operational testing may determine that the aircraft is not operationally effective or suitable;
(8) a XXXXXXXX preliminary operational assessment report, which is classified and based on limited data and analysis, identified 16 major deficiencies with the XXXXXXXX aircraft but concluded that the XXXXXXXX is potentially operationally effective and suitable;
(9) the XXXXXXXX has consistently stated that the XXXXXXXX will be developed and produced within the cost estimates established for the program;
(10) certain key assumptions on which the cost estimate was made have been overtaken by events;
(11) program documents state that the current development effort is funded based on the assumption that problems would not occur during testing;
(12) unanticipated aircraft deficiencies have occurred, and most of the program's management reserve has been depleted;
(13) since the flight test program has about 1 year remaining, it is probable that additional deficiencies will develop;
(14) correcting current and potential future deficiencies could result in the development effort exceeding the congressional cost cap;
(15) the XXXXXXXX unit procurement cost estimates are understated;
(16) these cost estimates were based on what has become unrealistically high quantities of XXXXXXXX aircraft that will be bought; and
(17) more realistic assumptions indicate that, although the total procurement cost will decrease, the XXXXXXXX unit cost will be more than the XXXXXXXX currently estimates.
(1) XXXXXXXX has revised the XXXXXXXX flight test program by decreasing the data collection requirements that were originally planned;
(2) program documents state that, although flight testing is behind schedule, program decisions to reduce test points will enable the XXXXXXXX to regain lost time and complete development testing in XXXXXXXX, as originally planned;
(3) XXXXXXXX program documents identified numerous deficiencies relative to the aircraft's operational performance;
(4) the most challenging technical issue is XXXXXXXX;
(5) until these issues are resolved through software or hardware changes that have been adequately tested, the cost, schedule, and operational performance impact of resolving these deficiencies cannot be determined;
(6) the XXXXXXXX remains confident that it can correct these deficiencies;
(7) in addition, XXXXXXXX that assesses risk areas in the XXXXXXXX program stated in XXXXXXXX, that operational testing may determine that the aircraft is not operationally effective or suitable;
(8) a XXXXXXXX preliminary operational assessment report, which is classified and based on limited data and analysis, identified 16 major deficiencies with the XXXXXXXX aircraft but concluded that the XXXXXXXX is potentially operationally effective and suitable;
(9) the XXXXXXXX has consistently stated that the XXXXXXXX will be developed and produced within the cost estimates established for the program;
(10) certain key assumptions on which the cost estimate was made have been overtaken by events;
(11) program documents state that the current development effort is funded based on the assumption that problems would not occur during testing;
(12) unanticipated aircraft deficiencies have occurred, and most of the program's management reserve has been depleted;
(13) since the flight test program has about 1 year remaining, it is probable that additional deficiencies will develop;
(14) correcting current and potential future deficiencies could result in the development effort exceeding the congressional cost cap;
(15) the XXXXXXXX unit procurement cost estimates are understated;
(16) these cost estimates were based on what has become unrealistically high quantities of XXXXXXXX aircraft that will be bought; and
(17) more realistic assumptions indicate that, although the total procurement cost will decrease, the XXXXXXXX unit cost will be more than the XXXXXXXX currently estimates.
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera