Varför tror du på förintelsen?

jag vill ställa en motfråga till vemsom, varför tror du inte på förintelsen?

COMMUNIST ORIGINS
Of the first kind, the most outstanding example is Commandant of Auschwitz by Rudolf
Hoess (London, 1960), which was originally published in the Polish language as
Wspomnienia
by the Communist Government. Hoess, a young man who took over at Auschwitz in 1940, was
first arrested by the British and detained at Flensburg, but he was soon handed over to the
Polish Communist authorities who condemned him to death in 1947 and executed him almost
immediately. The so-called Hoess memoirs are undoubtedly a forgery produced under
Communist auspices, as we shall demonstrate, though the Communists themselves claim that
Hoess was "ordered to write the story of his life" and a hand-written original supposedly exists,
but no one has ever seen it. Hoess was subjected to torture and brain-washing techniques by the
Communists during the period of his arrest, an
d his testimony at Nuremberg was delivered in a
mindless monotone as he stared blankly into space. Even Reitlinger rejects this testimony as
hopelessly untrustworthy. It is indeed remarkable how much of the "evidence" regarding the Six
Million stems from Communist sources; this includes the major documents such as the
Wisliceny statement and the Hoess "memoirs", which are undoubtedly the two most quoted
items in extermination literature, as well as all the information on the so-called "death camps"
such as Auschwitz. This information comes from the Jewish Historical Commission of Poland;
the Central Commission for the Investigation of War Crimes, Warsaw; and the Russian State
War Crimes Commission, Moscow. Reitlinger acknowledges that the Hoess testimony at
Nuremberg was a catalogue of wild exaggerations, such as that Auschwitz was disposing of
16,000 people a day, which would mean a total at the end of the war of over 13 million. Instead
of exposing such estimates for the Soviet-inspired frauds they obviously are, Reitlinger and
others prefer to think that such ridiculous exaggerations were due to "pride" in doing a
professional job. Ironically, this is completely
irreconcilable with the supposedly authentic
Hoess memoirs, which make a clever attempt at plausibility by suggesting the opposite picture
of distaste for the job. Hoess is supposed to have "confessed" to a total of 3 million people
exterminated at Auschwitz, though at his own trial in Warsaw the prosecution reduced the
number to 1,135,000. However, we have already noted that the Soviet Government announced
an official figure of 4 million after their "investigation" of the camp in 1945. This kind of casual
juggling with millions of people does not appear to worry the writers of extermination literature.
A review of the Hoess "memoirs" in all their horrid detail would be tedious. We may confine
ourselves to those aspects of the extermination legend which are designed with the obvious
purpose of forestalling any proof of its falsity. Such, for example, is the manner in which the
alleged extermination of Jews is described. This was supposed to have been carried out by a
"special detachment" of Jewish prisoners. They took charge of the newly arrived contingents at
the camp, led them into the enormous "gas-chambers" and disposed of the bodies afterwards.
The S.S., therefore, did very little, so that most of the S.S. personnel at the camp could be left in
complete ignorance of the "extermination programme". Of course, no Jew would ever be found
who claimed to have been a member of this gruesome "special detachment", so that the whole
issue is left conveniently unprovable. It is worth repeating that no living, authentic eye-witness
to these events has ever been produced. Conclusive evidence that the Hoess memoirs are a
forgery lies in an incredible slip by the Communist editors. Hoess is supposed to say that the
Jehovah's Witnesses at Auschwitz approved of murdering the Jews because the Jews were the
enemies of Christ. It is well known that in Soviet Russia today and in all her satellite countries of
eastern Europe, the Communists conduct a bitter campaign of suppression against the
Jehovah's Witnesses whom they regard as the religious sect most dangerous to Communist
beliefs. That this sect is deliberately and grossly defamed in the Hoess memoirs proves the
document's Communist origins beyond any doubt.

I augusti 1986 förklarade professorn i historia och dekanus för humanistiska fakulteten vid universitetet i Caen (Normandie), ledamoten av Institut de France och tidigare chef för utskottet för deportationens historia inom den officiella kommittén för andra världskrigets historia, Michel de Boüard, som själv under kriget deporterades som motståndsman, att när allt lagts samman, ”är dossieren rutten”. Han preciserade att dossieren ifråga, den om det tyska koncentrationslägersystemets historia, var ”rutten”på grund av, som han uttryckte det, ”en väldig mängd påhittade historier, felaktigheter som envist upprepades – i synnerhet vad beträffar siffrorna – sammansmältningar och generaliseringar”. Med hänsyftning på revisionisternas studier tillade han att det fanns ”hos den andra sidan mycket noggrant gjorda kritiska studier, som visade dessa överdrifters enfald”. (Ouest-France, 2 och 3 augusti 1986, s. 6)

15) År 1992 uppgav Yehuda Bauer, professor vid Hebreiska universitetet i Jerusalem, vid en internationell konferens om folkmordet på judarna, vilken hölls i London: ”Allmänheten upprepar alltjämt, gång på gång, den dumma historien om att man i Wannsee fattade beslut om att utrota judarna” (pressmeddelande från Jewish Telegraphic Agency publicerat under rubriken ”Betydelsen av Wannsee förkastas”, Canadian Jewish News, 30 januari 1992, s. 8).

17) År 1996 fick den vänsterinriktade franske historikern Jacques Baynac, vilken sedan år 1978 är ivrig antirevisionist, efter grundligt övervägande medge att det inte finns något bevis för de nazistiska gaskamrarnas existens. Man kan inte underlåta att notera, skrev Baynac, ”avsaknaden av dokument, spår eller andra materiella bevis” (Le Nouveau Quotidien de Lausanne [Schweiz], den 2 september 1996, s. 16, och den 3 september 1996, s. 14). Men han sade att han fortsatte att tro på existensen av dessa magiska gaskamrar.