2005-01-15, 17:15
#1
Revisionen av Churchills roll i historien fortskrider obevekligt, men det r nog ingen som frnekar det regiriga gamla fyllots karisma och frmga att f saker gjorda. Att han tilldelades Nobelpriset i litteratur tycks dock i dagens lge tmligen svrbegripligt...
Lnk till The Churchill Centre, ett par recensioner av den andra volymen av David Irvings Churchillmonografi, och boken som gratis pdf-download:
http://www.winstonchurchill.org/i4a/...cfm?pageid=342
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n4p43_Weber.html
"---It is difficult to avoid being impressed, even dazzled, by Churchill's colorful personality, in comparison with which most political leaders of the past fifty years seem pale midgets. From the pages of this book emerges a vivid portrait of an often exasperating and sometimes callous man of quick wit, myriad prejudices, puckish humor, arresting eloquence, and enormous energy.
As with Irving's other biographical works, this book's strength is also its weakness. While it is packed with day-to-day and even hour-to-hour detail, Irving sometimes, and perhaps unavoidably, neglects context and the larger picture. He sheds new light on Churchill's relations with major and minor figures of the fragile Allied wartime coalition, including, for example, his deep, abiding loathing of "Free French" leader Charles De Gaulle. Irving traces Churchill's wartime hypocrisy and treachery -- most tragically toward the Poles, on whose behalf Britain had declared war against Germany in 1939.---"
http://www.fpp.co.uk/reviews/Churchi...ald210701.html
"---The war between Churchill and Hitler ultimately came down to this: did the British people in 1940-1 prefer to be ruled by a man whom Irving accuses of dining on oysters, champagne and roast partridge or by a vegetarian teetotaller who spent his evenings discussing tank production statistics?
Were we for fun or virtue?
Having long since lost whatever Calvinist soul it may once have had, Britain chose the former. But Irving, one suspects, still has a Calvinist soul. And that is why men like the appalling Mr. Justice Gray mistrust his motives. In an odd sense, Irving is the victim of his own seriousness -- how very Scottish of him.---"
http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Churchill/2/index.html

Lnk till The Churchill Centre, ett par recensioner av den andra volymen av David Irvings Churchillmonografi, och boken som gratis pdf-download:
http://www.winstonchurchill.org/i4a/...cfm?pageid=342
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n4p43_Weber.html
"---It is difficult to avoid being impressed, even dazzled, by Churchill's colorful personality, in comparison with which most political leaders of the past fifty years seem pale midgets. From the pages of this book emerges a vivid portrait of an often exasperating and sometimes callous man of quick wit, myriad prejudices, puckish humor, arresting eloquence, and enormous energy.
As with Irving's other biographical works, this book's strength is also its weakness. While it is packed with day-to-day and even hour-to-hour detail, Irving sometimes, and perhaps unavoidably, neglects context and the larger picture. He sheds new light on Churchill's relations with major and minor figures of the fragile Allied wartime coalition, including, for example, his deep, abiding loathing of "Free French" leader Charles De Gaulle. Irving traces Churchill's wartime hypocrisy and treachery -- most tragically toward the Poles, on whose behalf Britain had declared war against Germany in 1939.---"
http://www.fpp.co.uk/reviews/Churchi...ald210701.html
"---The war between Churchill and Hitler ultimately came down to this: did the British people in 1940-1 prefer to be ruled by a man whom Irving accuses of dining on oysters, champagne and roast partridge or by a vegetarian teetotaller who spent his evenings discussing tank production statistics?

Having long since lost whatever Calvinist soul it may once have had, Britain chose the former. But Irving, one suspects, still has a Calvinist soul. And that is why men like the appalling Mr. Justice Gray mistrust his motives. In an odd sense, Irving is the victim of his own seriousness -- how very Scottish of him.---"
http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Churchill/2/index.html